You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I had a small query regarding M3GNet. I wanted to know whether the prediction coming out of the M3GNet model works well only when we take other structures alongwith the structure which is most stable ie ....whose energy above the hull plot is 0eV/atom?
Recently, I observed this pattern with whatever potential was developed by me. The moment I take the structure of a material which has energy above the hull plot around 20meV/atom....the entire potential prediction in combination with other structure fails. Only when I take in combination with the most stable structure..I get some good results. If you have any idea in this direction...can you please shed light on it .
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I had a small query regarding M3GNet. I wanted to know whether the prediction coming out of the M3GNet model works well only when we take other structures alongwith the structure which is most stable ie ....whose energy above the hull plot is 0eV/atom?
Recently, I observed this pattern with whatever potential was developed by me. The moment I take the structure of a material which has energy above the hull plot around 20meV/atom....the entire potential prediction in combination with other structure fails. Only when I take in combination with the most stable structure..I get some good results. If you have any idea in this direction...can you please shed light on it .
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions