-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Access control #219
Comments
Did SN mention a preferred way that they would like to be able to control onboarding of users? |
@mkdbns the preferred method would be to select people based on the group they belong to. However, I confirmed they don't have AD/LDAP Groups enabled. The only other ways I can think of identifying different types of users is by using the MM System Roles or MM User Roles |
@darias416 this may be a good topic to raise with Spiros on our morning call, given they manage the Cloud deployment & may have additional suggestions around access control. |
Was there additional suggestions from Spiros and team around access control? |
@johndavidlugtu no concrete solutions yet, but we'll be meeting again next Tuesday to discuss options further |
@johndavidlugtu we discussed the possibility of leveraging Okta groups. We will need to explore further. |
@darias416 I think this issue can be closed now as this is done via the whitelist feature. Here's the PR - #342 |
In preparation for deploying the plugin in production, Hercules needs a way to control access to the plugin to facilitate a staged rollout.
Currently, the only existing mechanism is the "Enabled Teams" configuration. However, Hercules has only 1 Mattermost Team with several thousand users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: