You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the taxa explorer, environmental bar charts on the right side seems inaccurate. E.g. for query "Candidatus Omnitrophica", the bars of the top hits suggest a notable fraction of "animal", but hovering over shows only around ~1-2%, less than suggested, and similar sized bars show quite different values (1.05%, 0.84% and 3.11% look almost identical). It becomes quite clear when comparing charts for MAPv3;99_56452:
vs
(samples / reads). It's also not clear where the 1.05% animal fraction when hovering over the bar of that OTU come from, the taxon page shows different values for samples / reads.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the taxa explorer, environmental bar charts on the right side seems inaccurate. E.g. for query "Candidatus Omnitrophica", the bars of the top hits suggest a notable fraction of "animal", but hovering over shows only around ~1-2%, less than suggested, and similar sized bars show quite different values (1.05%, 0.84% and 3.11% look almost identical). It becomes quite clear when comparing charts for MAPv3;99_56452:
vs
(samples / reads). It's also not clear where the 1.05% animal fraction when hovering over the bar of that OTU come from, the taxon page shows different values for samples / reads.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: