Deprecated

Angular 2 Style Guide

The purpose of the following style guide is to present a set of best practices and style guidelines for the development of Angular 2 applications. If you are looking for an opinionated style guide for syntax, conventions, and structuring Angular 2 applications, then you can step in!

Disclaimer: This document is an alpha version which means that some of the guidelines will change and new ones will be added.

You are welcome to join the discussion of the best practices here.

The guidelines described below are based on:

Angular 2 source code.
Suggestions by Miško Hevery from his technical review of "Switching to Angular 2".
My own development experience working in a team on large-scale Angular 2 application.
John Papa's AngularJS 1.x style guide, for being consistent with the directory structure and testing across the different major versions of the framework.

Codelyzer makes sure your project is following the Angular 2 Style Guide using static-code analysis. It is already integrated in the following projects:

angular-cli
angular2-seed
angular2-webpack-starter

Directory Structure

Group files by the bounded context they belong to. When a context (directory, for instance) grows to contain more than 9 files, start to consider creating a separate context by-type for them. Your threshold may be different, so adjust as needed:

.
├── admin
│   ├── home-dashboard.component.ts
│   ├── home-dashboard.component.html
│   ├── home-dashboard.component.css
│   ├── home-dashboard.component.spec.ts
│   ├── login.component.ts
│   ├── login.component.spec.ts
│   ├── admin.model.ts
│   ├── user-management.service.ts
│   ├── order-management.service.ts
│   └── index.ts
│── shop
│   ├── components
│   │   ├── edit-profile.component.ts
│   │   ├── edit-profile.component.html
│   │   ├── edit-profile.component.css
│   │   ├── edit-profile.component.spec.ts
│   │   ├── home.component.ts
│   │   ├── home.component.spec.ts
│   │   ├── home.component.html
│   │   ├── register.component.ts
│   │   └── register.component.spec.ts
│   ├── models
│   │   ├── shopping-cart.model.ts
│   │   ├── shopping-item.model.ts
│   │   └── user.model.ts
│   ├── services
│   │   └── checkout.service.ts
│   └── index.ts
├── components
│   ├── avatar.component.ts
│   ├── avatar.component.html
│   ├── login-form.component.ts
│   ├── login-form.component.html
│   ├── login-form.component.css
│   └── login-form.component.spec.ts
├── directives
│   ├── form-validator.directive.ts
│   ├── form-validator.directive.spec.ts
│   ├── tooltip.directive.ts
│   └── tooltip.directive.spec.ts
├── services
│   └── authorization.service.ts
└── pipes
    ├── format-order-name.pipe.ts
    └── format-order-name.pipe.spec.ts

Why?: The level of reusability of logic between bounded contexts should be low. On the other hand each code unit will belong to the bounded context it is associated with and will not pollute the directory structure.

Why?: Separation by bounded context will allow easier code reusability. In the general case a small, to medium application will contain a single bounded context, which will lead to a flat directory structure as the following:

shop
├── components
│   ├── edit-profile.component.ts
│   ├── edit-profile.component.spec.ts
│   ├── edit-profile.component.html
│   ├── home.component.ts
│   ├── home.component.spec.ts
│   ├── home.component.html
│   ├── register.component.ts
│   └── register.component.spec.ts
├── models
│   ├── shopping-cart.model.ts
│   ├── shopping-item.model.ts
│   └── user.model.ts
├── services
│   └── checkout.service.ts
└── index.ts

Why?: A developer can locate the code, identify what each file represents at a glance, the structure is flat as can be, and there is no repetitive nor redundant names.

Why?: When there are a lot of files (9+) locating them is easier with a consistent folder structures and more difficult in flat structures.

Export and access all public members for given bounded context by its index.ts file located in the root directory of the context itself (for more information take a look at this issue).

Why?: Having a facade which exports the public members enforces encapsulation.

Why?: Exporting all public members using a high-level facade shortens the paths to the individual code units.
```
shop
├── components
│   └── register.component.ts
└── index.ts
```
For instance, in case the register component is exported with the index.ts facade by:
```
// index.ts
export * from './components/register.component';
```
On the example below, we can import it using:
```
import {RegisterComponent} from './shop/index';
```
Instead of:
```
import {RegisterComponent} from './shop/components/register.component';
```
Why?: Can be applied with TypeScript's compiler option: moduleResolution: node, which will reduce the import to:
```
import {RegisterComponent} from './shop';
```

The second level division of the directory structure, which is associated with given bounded context and excludes the nested bounded context, should be by either code unit type (as illustrated on the examples above) or by feature like shown below:

shop
├── edit-profile
│   ├── edit-profile.component.ts
│   ├── edit-profile.component.spec.ts
│   └── edit-profile.component.html
├── home
│   ├── home.component.ts
│   ├── home.component.spec.ts
│   └── home.component.html
├── register
│   ├── register.component.ts
│   └── register.component.spec.ts
├── common
│   ├── shopping-cart.model.ts
│   ├── shopping-item.model.ts
│   ├── checkout.service.ts
│   ├── user.model.ts
│   └── index.ts
└── index.ts

In case given bounded context contains two or more child contexts, divide them into separate directories:
```
shop
├── cart
│   ├── components
│   └── index.ts
├── checkout
│   ├── components
│   └── index.ts
└── services
```
There is a single top-level bounded context here called shop and two child contexts called cart and checkout.

Why?: Grouping the contexts in such a way will stimulate lazy-loading and bundling of the child contexts together.

Why?: This directory structure naturally follows the root-level division by bounded contexts.

Implement lazy-loading and/or bundling by bounded contexts. For instance:

.
├── admin
│   ├── components
│   │   └─ admin.component.ts
│   └── index.ts
│── shop
│   ├── cart
│   │   ├── ...
│   │   └── index.ts
│   ├── checkout
│   │   ├── ...
│   │   └── index.ts
│   ├── components
│   │   └─ shop.component.ts
│   └── index.ts
├── components
│   └── app.component.ts
├── directives
│   └── ...
├── services
│   └── ...
└── pipes
    └── ...

In case the app.component.ts file contains the following route definition:

@RouteConfig([
  {
    loader: () => System.import('../shop/index').then((m: any) => m.AdminComponent),
    path: '/admin'
  },
  {
    loader: () => System.import('../shop/index').then((m: any) => m.ShopComponent),
    path: '/shop'
  }
])
export class AppComponent {...}

And the user opens https://example.com/shop, during the initial load time the browser should load only:

All top-level code units in components, directives, services, pipes.
The entire shop bounded context, except its nested bounded contexts (in this case they should be loaded-lazily, just like the top-level bounded contexts).

Why?: In big projects will be loaded only the part of the application required for the selected functionality (in this case the shop module).

Do not access directly code units located in another bounded context located on the same or lower level of nesting. The only two exceptions are: via an AsyncRoute (since by default such bounded contexts are loaded lazily) or in case the application is not supposed to be lazily loaded (which in case of big applications is considered as a bad practice).

Why?: This way the lazy loading will be prevented, since the lower level bounded context will be bundled (or loaded) together with their parent bounded contexts.
Define all shared among bounded contexts components into a top-level directories. The code units can be combined into different directories by name, or in case their count grows significantly they should be grouped by type (as shown above).

Why?: The usage of shared directory for the common code units requires longer import paths without bringing much value.

Why?: The used across bounded contexts code units are supposed to be loaded/bundled before/together with all nested bounded contexts and reused across them.
Export and access all public members for given bounded context by its index.ts file located in the root directory of the context itself (for more information take a look at this issue).

Why?: Having a facade which exports the public members enforces encapsulation.

Why?: Exporting all public members using a high-level facade shortens the paths to the individual code units.
```
shop
├── components
│   └── register.component.ts
└── index.ts
```
For instance, in case the register component is exported with the index.ts facade, on the example below, we can import it using:
```
import {RegisterComponent} from './shop/index';
```
Instead of:
```
import {RegisterComponent} from './shop/components/register.component';
```
In case given bounded context contains two or more child contexts, divide them into separate directories:
```
shop
├── cart
│   ├── components
│   └── index.ts
├── checkout
│   ├── components
│   └── index.ts
└── services
```
There is a single top-level bounded context here called shop and two child contexts called cart and checkout.

Why?: Grouping the contexts in such a way will stimulate lazy-loading and bundling of the child contexts together.

Why?: This directory structure naturally follows the root-level division by bounded contexts.

Implement lazy-loading and/or bundling by bounded contexts. For instance:

.
├── admin
│   ├── components
│   │   └─ admin.component.ts
│   └── index.ts
│── shop
│   ├── cart
│   │   ├── ...
│   │   └── index.ts
│   ├── checkout
│   │   ├── ...
│   │   └── index.ts
│   ├── components
│   │   └─ shop.component.ts
│   └── index.ts
├── components
│   └── app.component.ts
├── directives
│   └── ...
├── services
│   └── ...
└── pipes
    └── ...

In case the app.component.ts file contains the following route definition:

@RouteConfig([
  {
    loader: () => System.import('../shop/index').then((m: any) => m.AdminComponent),
    path: '/admin'
  },
  {
    loader: () => System.import('../shop/index').then((m: any) => m.ShopComponent),
    path: '/shop'
  }
])
export class AppComponent {...}

And the user opens https://example.com/shop, during the initial load time the browser should load only:

All top-level code units in components, directives, services, pipes.
The entire shop bounded context, except its nested bounded contexts (in this case they should be loaded-lazily, just like the top-level bounded contexts).

Why?: In big projects will be loaded only the part of the application required for the selected functionality (in this case the shop module).

Do not access directly code units located in another bounded context located on the same or lower level of nesting. The only two exceptions are: via an AsyncRoute (since by default such bounded contexts are loaded lazily) or in case the application is not supposed to be lazily loaded (which in case of big applications is considered as a bad practice).

Why?: This way the lazy loading will be prevented, since the lower level bounded context will be bundled (or loaded) together with their parent bounded contexts.
Define all shared among bounded contexts components into a top-level directories. The code units can be combined into different directories by name, or in case their count grows significantly they should be grouped by type (as shown above).

Why?: The usage of shared directory for the common code units requires longer import paths without bringing much value.

Why?: The used across bounded contexts code units are supposed to be loaded/bundled before/together with all nested bounded contexts and reused across them.
Define only a single code unit (component, directive, service, pipe, etc.) per file. If the unit uses other internal for the given module logic you can keep it in the same module, without exporting it.

Why?: The definitions will be easier to find simply by looking at the directory structure.

Why?: Do not export private APIs because you need to manage them and keep them consistent for the end users.
Name the files which contain component, directives, pipes, services or other code unit with the corresponding suffix.
```
// Contains the "home-dashboard" component
home-dashboard.component.ts

// Contains the ShoppingCart model.
shopping-cart.model.ts

// Contains the logic for the "checkout" service.
checkout.service.ts

// For redux-like architecture
todo.store.ts
todo.reducer.ts
```
Why? This way files can be discovered easier using text editor's/IDE's fuzzy search and also in case of many tabs open the different code units are easy recognizable.

On the example above we it is obvious for us what type of functionality is opened in the individual tabs.
Keep the modules self-contained and coherent. Each module should have a single reason to change.

Why?: This way the modules will be more reusable, and thus composable.
Name the modules/directories with lower-kebab-case.

Why?: Using lower case will not cause problem across platforms with different case sensitivity.

Why?: By using only English letters, numbers and dash (-) the file names will be consistent across platforms.

Why?: Keeps consistency with AngularJS 1.x style guidelines.
```
/* RECOMMENDED */
tooltip.directive.ts
user.service.ts
```
Table of Contents

Directives and Components

Use attributes as selectors for your directives.

Why?: There could be many directives per element, which makes it more suitable to use attributes as opposed to elements.
Use lowerCamelCase for naming the selectors of your directives.

Why?: Keeps the names of the properties defined in the controllers that are bound to the view consistent with the attribute names.

Why?: The Angular 2 HTML parser is case sensitive so lowerCamelCase attributes are well supported.

Use custom prefix for the selector of your directives (for instance below is used the prefix sg from Style Guide).

Why?: This way you will be able to prevent name collisions.

/* AVOID */
@Directive({
  selector: '[tooltip]'
})
class BootstrapTooltipDirective {}

@Directive({
  selector: '[tooltip]'
})
class CustomTooltipDirective {}

@Component({
  selector: 'app',
  template: `...`,
  directives: [CustomTooltip, BootstrapTooltip]
})
class AppComponent {}

/* RECOMMENDED */
@Directive({
  selector: '[bsTooltip]'
})
class BootstrapTooltipDirective {}

@Directive({
  selector: '[myTooltip]'
})
class CustomTooltipDirective {}

@Component({
  selector: 'sg-app',
  template: `...`,
  directives: [CustomTooltip, BootstrapTooltip]
})
class AppComponent {}

Name directives' controllers with Directive suffix and components' controllers with Component suffix. The name of any directive or component should be formed following the rule BasicDescription + Directive or Component.
```
/* RECOMMENDED */
@Directive({
  selector: '[sgTooltip]`
})
class TooltipDirective {}

@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {}
```
Why?: When any code unit is imported the consumer will know how to use it based on its name, i.e. ButtonComponent means that:
- This is a controller of a component.
- The component should be used as an element.
Why?: In case a name suffix is used the class is easier to find with IDE's/text editor's fuzzy search.
Use @HostListener and @HostBinding instead of the host property of the @Directive and @Component decorators:

Why?: The name of the property, or method name associated to @HostBinding or respectively @HostListener should be modified only in a single place - in the directive's controller. In contrast if you use host you need to modify both the property declaration inside the controller, and the metadata associated to the directive.

Why?: The metadata declaration attached to the directive is shorter and thus more readable.
```
/* AVOID */
@Directive({
  selector: '[sgSample]',
  host: {
    '(mouseenter)': 'onMouseEnter()',
    'attr.role': 'button'
  }
})
class SampleDirective {
  role = 'button';
  onMouseEnter() {...}
}
```
```
/* RECOMMENDED */
@Directive({
  selector: '[sgSample]'
})
class SampleDirective {
  @HostBinding('attr.role') role = 'button';
  @HostListener('mouseenter') onMouseEnter() {...}
}
```
Use element selectors for components.

Why?: There could be only a single component per element.

Why?: Components are the actual elements in our applications, compared to directives which only augment the elements.

Use kebab-case for naming the element selectors of your components.

Why?: Keeps the element names consistent with the specification for Custom Elements.

/* AVOID */
@Component({
  selector: '[sg-button]',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {}

/* RECOMMENDED */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {}

Name events without the prefix on.

Name your event handler methods with the prefix on followed by the event name.

/* AVOID */
@Component(...)
export class VoterComponent {
  @Output() onVoted = new EventEmitter<boolean>();
}

<my-voter (onVoted)="onVoted($event)"></my-voter>

/* RECOMMENDED */
@Component(...)
export class VoterComponent {
  @Output() voted = new EventEmitter<boolean>();
}

<my-voter (voted)="onVoted($event)"></my-voter>

Why?: This is to be consistent with built-in events like button clicks:

<button (click)="showDetails()">Show Details</button>

Why?: Angular allows for an alternative syntax on-*. If the event itself was prefixed with on this would result in an on-onEvent binding expression.

/* RECOMMENDED */
<hero-list (heroSelected)="onHeroSelected(selectedHero)"></hero-list>
<hero-list on-heroSelected="onHeroSelected(selectedHero)"></hero-list>

Keep the components as simple and coherent as possible but not too simple.

Why?: Simple coherent components are easier to reason about, more reusable and composable.

Why?: Components which are too primitive may lead to scattering and harder management of the user interface of our applications.
Keep the components' templates as lean as possible and inline them inside of the @Component decorator.

Why?: Keeping the components' templates short implies simple, composable components.

Why?: Keeping the template next to the component's controller makes it easier to lookup the component's structure and/or modify it.
Extract the more complex and bigger templates, longer than 15 lines of code, into a separate file and put them next to their controllers' definition.

Why?: In case a big and complex template is inlined in the component metadata it may shift the focus from the component's logic defined within the controller.
Locate the template of the component in the same directory where the component's logic resides in.
Use absolute URLs for paths to the templates of the components (set using templateUrl).

Why?: moduleId is not supported by all module loaders. In case we use module.id we will reduce the portability of our code to only CommonJS.

Use @Input and @Output instead of the inputs and outputs properties of the @Directive and @Component decorators:

Why?: The name of the property, or event name associated to @Input or respectively @Output should be modified only on a single place.

Why?: The metadata declaration attached to the directive is shorter and thus more readable.

/* AVOID */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`,
  inputs: [
    'label'
  ],
  outputs: [
    'change'
  ]
})
class ButtonComponent {
  change = new EventEmitter<any>();
  label: string;
}

/* RECOMMENDED */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {
  @Output()
  change = new EventEmitter<any>();
  @Input()
  label: string;
}

Do not rename inputs and outputs.

Why?: May lead to confusion when the output or the input properties of a given directive are named a given way but exported differently as a public API.

/* AVOID */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {
  @Output('changeEvent') change = new EventEmitter<any>();
  @Input('labelAttribute') label: string;
}
/*
 * Need to be consumed the following way:
 *
 * <sg-button labelAttribute="foobar" (changeEvent)="doStuff()">
 * </sg-button>
 */

/* RECOMMENDED */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {
  @Output() change = new EventEmitter<any>();
  @Input() label: string;
}
/*
 * Need to be consumed the following way, which is much more straightforward:
 *
 * <sg-button label="foobar" (change)="doStuff()">
 * </sg-button>
 */

Prefer inputs over the @Attribute parameter decorator.

Why?: The input creates one-way binding which means that we can bind it to an expression and its value gets automatically updated. We can inject a property with @Attribute to a controller's constructor and get its value a single time.

/* AVOID */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {
  label: string;
  constructor(@Attribute('label') label) {
    this.label = label;
  }
}

/* RECOMMENDED */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {
  @Input() label: string;
}

Detach components and directives which are not visible from the view in order to prevent the change detection running over them.

/* RECOMMENDED */
@Directive({
  selector: '[pane]'
})
class Pane {
  @Input() title;
  view: EmbeddedViewRef;
  constructor(private _changeDetectorRef: ChangeDetectorRef) {}
  // Attaches the change detector
  show() {
    this._changeDetectorRef.reattach();
  }
  // Detaches the change detector
  hide() {
    this._changeDetectorRef.detach();
  }
}

Do not directly access native elements injected to the controller's constructors with ElementRef.

Why?: This way the application will get tightly coupled to the platform and thus won't be able to run independently from it. For instance, a web application injecting native DOM elements won't be able to run in WebWorker, nor be rendered on the server-side.

/* AVOID */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-text-field',
  template: `<input type="text">`
})
class TextFieldComponent {
  value: string;
  constructor(el: ElementRef) {
    el.nativeElement.querySelector('input[type="text"]')
      .onchange = () => this.value = el.value;
  }
}

/* RECOMMENDED */
import {NgModel} from 'angular2/common';

@Component({
  directives: [NgModel],
  selector: 'sg-text-field',
  template: `<input [(ngModel)]="value" type="text">`
})
class TextFieldComponent {
  value: string;
}

Keep the component templates logicless.

Why?: Keeping the logic of the components in their controller, instead of template will bring a lot of benefits such as better testability, maintability, reusability.

Do not manipulate element referenced within the template.

Why?: This way the application will get tightly coupled to the platform and thus won't be able to run independently from it. For instance, a web application injecting native DOM elements won't be able to run in WebWorker, neither be rendered on the server-side.

/* AVOID */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-items-list',
  template: `
    <input type="text" #textInput>
    <button (click)="add(textInput.value)">Add</button>
  `
})
class ItemListComponent {
  values: string[] = [];
  add(val) {
    this.values.push(val);
  }
}

/* RECOMMENDED */
import {NgModel} from 'angular2/common';

@Component({
  directives: [NgModel],
  selector: 'sg-items-list',
  template: `
    <input type="text" [(ngModel)]="value">
    <button (click)="add()">Add</button>
  `
})
class ItemListComponent {
  value: string;
  values: string[] = [];
  add() {
    this.values.push(this.value);
  }
}

Always explicitly implement the interfaces associated with the used by given component life-cycle hooks.

Why?: In case the interface associated to given life-cycle hook is implemented one will get compile-time errors in case the hook is not implemented properly (for instance, the method name is misspelled).

/* AVOID */
@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent {
  ngOnInit() {
    console.log('The component got initialized');
  }
}

/* RECOMMENDED */
import {OnInit} from 'angular2/core';

@Component({
  selector: 'sg-button',
  template: `...`
})
class ButtonComponent implements OnInit {
  ngOnInit() {
    console.log('The component got initialized');
  }
}

Table of Contents

Services and Dependency Injection

Limit the usage of forwardRef.

Why?: The usage of forwardRef indicates either a cyclic dependency or inconsistency in the services' declaration (i.e. the dependent service is declared before its dependency). In both cases there is usually a better approach to be used.
Do not declare global providers in the bootstrap call, use a top-level component instead.

Why?: The providers registered in the bootstrap method are meant for overriding existing providers rather than declaring dependencies.

Table of Contents

Pipes

Name pipes' controllers with Pipe as suffix. The name of any pipe should be formed observing the BasicDescription + Pipe rule.
Always implement the PipeTransform interface when building a Pipe.

Why? This ensures your custom Pipes will conform to the framework requirements should they change in the future.

Name your pipe name property in camelCase.

/* AVOID */
@Pipe({
  name: 'sg-transform-something'
})
class TransformSomething {
  transform(input: any): any {
    //...
  }
}

/* RECOMMENDED */
@Pipe({
  name: 'sgTransformSomething'
})
class TransformSomethingPipe implements PipeTransform {
  transform(input: any): any {
    //...
  }
}

Use impure pipes only when they need to hold state.

Why?: The change detection can optimize pure pipes since they hold the referential transparency property.
Wherever stateful (impure) pipes are required, implement the OnDestroy interface.

Why? It is likely that a stateful pipe may contain state that should be cleaned up when a binding is destroyed. For example, a subscription to a stream of data may need to be disposed, or an interval may need to be cleared.

Table of Contents

Routing

Name the routes the same way the components associated with them are called without the Component suffix.

Why?: This way there is only a single name associated to a given route. This avoids confusion in case a given route is called in a different way to the components associated with it.

Table of Contents

Forms

Do not use expression for name of a control.

Why?: When the name of the control is dynamically generated it will be hard to reference it inside of the controller associated to the form, and may lead to confusion.

/* AVOID */
<form>
  <input [ngControl]="foobar" type="text">
</form>

@Component(...)
class SampleComponent {
  foobar = 'foo';
}

/* RECOMMENDED */
<form>
  <input ngControl="foo" type="text">
</form>

@Component(...)
class SampleComponent {}

Table of Contents

Reusable libraries

Waiting for announcement of official module format by angular-cli.

Table of Contents

Testing

Use Jasmine for unit testing.

Why?: It is well supported and popular in the JavaScript community.

Why?: It is widely popular in the Angular community. Jasmine is used for testing both AngularJS 1.x and Angular 2.

Why?: It has up-to-date type definitions so you can have great development experience using TypeScript.
Use Karma as test runner.
Place your test files side-by-side with your client code.

Why?: The tests are easier to find since they are always next to the code they are testing.

Why?: When you update source code it is easier to go update the tests at the same time.

Why?: The code may act as documentation of the tested component.
Name the test file the following way NAME_OF_THE_TESTED_UNIT.spec.EXT:
```
/* RECOMMENDED */
about.ts
about.spec.ts
```
Place integration tests and tests that cover multiple code units into a separate tests directory in your project's root.

Table of Contents
Use protractor for End-to-End testing.

Why?: It provides high-level API on top of the Selenium WebDriver and is supported by the Angular core team.
Name the End-to-End test files using the following convention: NAME_OF_THE_TESTED_UNIT.e2e.EXT.

Change detection

Use OnPush change detection strategy for pure/dumb components that accepts as input immutable data.

Why?: Angular will optimize the performance of your application dramatically by not performing change detection over the entire sub tree with root the given pure component.

Table of Contents

TypeScript specific practices

Use TSLint for linting your code.

Why?: In big teams, code following the same practices is easier to read and understand.
Be as explicit in the type definitions as possible (i.e. use any as rarely as possible).

Why?: any makes TypeScript behaves like a dynamic language. This way we gave up all the benefits we get from static typing such as better IDE/text editor support and compile-time type-checking.

TypeScript code style

Use _ in private variable and property names.

Why?: It is more obvious when debigging without source maps which property is public and which is private.

Why?: It is considered bad practice to access private members in your templates. When such members are named with _ it is more obvious that they should not be explosed to the template.

class MyClass {
  public myPublicString:string = 'foobar, but public';
  private _myPrivateString:string = 'foobar';

  // exception: property field
  private _answerToEverything:number = 42;

  public get answerToEverything():number {
    return this._answerToEverything;
  }

  public set answerToEverything(value:number) {
    this._answerToEverything = value;
  }
}

TypeScript dependency injection

Use the @Injectable() decorator instead of explicitly declaring the dependencies using @Inject(TOKEN).

Why?: Using @Injectable() the TypeScript compiler will emit the required type metadata, which makes the code using @Inject() unnecessary verbose and less readable.

TSLint

Use TSLint for linting your JavaScript and be sure to customize the TSLint options file and include in source control. See the TSLint docs for details on the options.

Why?: Provides a first alert prior to committing any code to source control.

Why?: Provides consistency across your team.

{
  "rules": {
    "class-name": true,
    "curly": false,
    "eofline": true,
    "indent": "spaces",
    "max-line-length": [true, 140],
    "member-ordering": [true,
      "public-before-private",
      "static-before-instance",
      "variables-before-functions"
    ],
    "no-arg": true,
    "no-construct": true,
    "no-duplicate-key": true,
    "no-duplicate-variable": true,
    "no-empty": true,
    "no-eval": true,
    "no-trailing-comma": true,
    "no-trailing-whitespace": true,
    "no-unused-expression": true,
    "no-unused-variable": true,
    "no-unreachable": true,
    "no-use-before-declare": true,
    "one-line": [true,
      "check-open-brace",
      "check-catch",
      "check-else",
      "check-whitespace"
    ],
    "quotemark": [true, "single"],
    "semicolon": true,
    "triple-equals": true,
    "variable-name": false
  }
}

Table of Contents

ES2015 and ES2016 specific practices

ES5 specific practices

Use the internal JavaScript DLS provided by Angular 2 for annotating constructor functions.

Why?: This syntax is simpler, more readable and closer to the original TypeScript version of the code.

Why?: The DLS uses function expressions which are closer to the non-hoisted ES2015 classes.

/* AVOID */
function Component() {
  //...
}
Component.annotations = [
  new ng.core.ComponentMetadata({
    //...
  }),
  new ng.router.RouteConfig([
    //...
  ])
];

/* RECOMMENDED */
var Component = ng.
  Component({
    //...
  })
  .RouteConfig([
    //...
  ])
  .Class({
    constructor: function () {
      //...
    }
  });

JSHint

Use JSHint for linting your JavaScript and be sure to customize the JSHint options file and include in source control. See the JSHint docs for details on the options.

Why?: Provides a first alert prior to committing any code to source control.

Why?: Provides consistency across your team.

{
    "bitwise": true,
    "camelcase": true,
    "curly": true,
    "eqeqeq": true,
    "es3": false,
    "forin": true,
    "freeze": true,
    "immed": true,
    "indent": 2,
    "latedef": "nofunc",
    "newcap": true,
    "noarg": true,
    "noempty": true,
    "nonbsp": true,
    "nonew": true,
    "plusplus": false,
    "quotmark": "single",
    "undef": true,
    "unused": false,
    "strict": false,
    "maxparams": 10,
    "maxdepth": 5,
    "maxstatements": 40,
    "maxcomplexity": 8,
    "maxlen": 140,

    "asi": false,
    "boss": false,
    "debug": false,
    "eqnull": true,
    "esnext": false,
    "evil": false,
    "expr": false,
    "funcscope": false,
    "globalstrict": false,
    "iterator": false,
    "lastsemic": false,
    "laxbreak": false,
    "laxcomma": false,
    "loopfunc": true,
    "maxerr": false,
    "moz": false,
    "multistr": false,
    "notypeof": false,
    "proto": false,
    "scripturl": false,
    "shadow": false,
    "sub": true,
    "supernew": false,
    "validthis": false,
    "noyield": false,

    "browser": true,
    "node": true,

    "globals": {
        "angular": false,
        "ng": false
    }
}

JSCS

Use JSCS for checking your coding styles your JavaScript and be sure to customize the JSCS options file and include in source control. See the JSCS docs for details on the options.

Why?: Provides a first alert prior to committing any code to source control.

Why?: Provides consistency across your team.

{
    "excludeFiles": ["node_modules/**", "bower_components/**"],

    "requireCurlyBraces": [
        "if",
        "else",
        "for",
        "while",
        "do",
        "try",
        "catch"
    ],
    "requireOperatorBeforeLineBreak": true,
    "requireCamelCaseOrUpperCaseIdentifiers": true,
    "maximumLineLength": {
      "value": 140,
      "allowComments": true,
      "allowRegex": true
    },
    "validateIndentation": 2,
    "validateQuoteMarks": "'",

    "disallowMultipleLineStrings": true,
    "disallowMixedSpacesAndTabs": true,
    "disallowTrailingWhitespace": true,
    "disallowSpaceAfterPrefixUnaryOperators": true,
    "disallowMultipleVarDecl": null,

    "requireSpaceAfterKeywords": [
      "if",
      "else",
      "for",
      "while",
      "do",
      "switch",
      "return",
      "try",
      "catch"
    ],
    "requireSpaceBeforeBinaryOperators": [
        "=", "+=", "-=", "*=", "/=", "%=", "<<=", ">>=", ">>>=",
        "&=", "|=", "^=", "+=",

        "+", "-", "*", "/", "%", "<<", ">>", ">>>", "&",
        "|", "^", "&&", "||", "===", "==", ">=",
        "<=", "<", ">", "!=", "!=="
    ],
    "requireSpaceAfterBinaryOperators": true,
    "requireSpacesInConditionalExpression": true,
    "requireSpaceBeforeBlockStatements": true,
    "requireLineFeedAtFileEnd": true,
    "disallowSpacesInsideObjectBrackets": "all",
    "disallowSpacesInsideArrayBrackets": "all",
    "disallowSpacesInsideParentheses": true,

    "jsDoc": {
        "checkAnnotations": true,
        "checkParamNames": true,
        "requireParamTypes": true,
        "checkReturnTypes": true,
        "checkTypes": true
    },

    "disallowMultipleLineBreaks": true,

    "disallowCommaBeforeLineBreak": null,
    "disallowDanglingUnderscores": null,
    "disallowEmptyBlocks": null,
    "disallowTrailingComma": null,
    "requireCommaBeforeLineBreak": null,
    "requireDotNotation": null,
    "requireMultipleVarDecl": null,
    "requireParenthesesAroundIIFE": true
}

Table of Contents

Tooling

codelyzer - set of tslint rules Angular 2.
Sublime Text snippets Angular 2.
WebStorm snippets Angular 2

License

MIT

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

README.md

README.md

Deprecated

Angular 2 Style Guide

Table of Contents

Directory Structure

Directives and Components

Services and Dependency Injection

Pipes

Routing

Forms

Reusable libraries

Testing

Change detection

TypeScript specific practices

TypeScript code style

TypeScript dependency injection

TSLint

ES2015 and ES2016 specific practices

ES5 specific practices

JSHint

JSCS

Tooling

License

Files

README.md

Latest commit

History

README.md

File metadata and controls

Deprecated

Angular 2 Style Guide

Table of Contents

Directory Structure

Directives and Components

Services and Dependency Injection

Pipes

Routing

Forms

Reusable libraries

Testing

Change detection

TypeScript specific practices

TypeScript code style

TypeScript dependency injection

TSLint

ES2015 and ES2016 specific practices

ES5 specific practices

JSHint

JSCS

Tooling

License