You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Packages such as wire-desktop-bin have some messed up .SRCINFOs. Now obviously the .SRCINFOs should be fixed to be indented nicely but I do believe the srcinfo format is not white space dependant. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/.SRCINFO Does say "Lines may be indented." which leads me to think it's optional.
Instead the pkgname = field should be treated as the start of a new package, no matter the indention.
This should allow gopkgbuild to be more robust and not fail to parse those weird .SRCINFOs that are different but technically correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kodo-pp
added a commit
to kodo-pp/gopkgbuild
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2018
Packages such as wire-desktop-bin have some messed up .SRCINFOs. Now obviously the .SRCINFOs should be fixed to be indented nicely but I do believe the srcinfo format is not white space dependant. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/.SRCINFO Does say "Lines may be indented." which leads me to think it's optional.
Instead the
pkgname =
field should be treated as the start of a new package, no matter the indention.This should allow gopkgbuild to be more robust and not fail to parse those weird .SRCINFOs that are different but technically correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: