-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unintuitive connection for Vertical Mesecon #652
Comments
The vertical mesecons does connect to the node above. Try this for example with a mese block instead of a piston. |
Oh, aright!:) It sounds like you aren't interested in any changes to the mod, as it would break someone (unspecified amount of) builds? |
I'm not a maintainer. But breaking mesecons builds is bad imo. |
So, it sound like u feel that not breaking existing builds, is more important than making it more intuitive to build new builds?:) |
In this case, yes. |
Aright:) In that case a work around could be to only change out the model for the vertical mesecon with the "rod-part" when there's a Mese Block (or some other node that it will effect) on top of it? That way it would leave any current build intact, while letting the models reflect the behavior of the mesecon:) |
It looks like the piston should be powered here? It feels like it would be more intuitive if (1) the piston extended, or (2) the Vertical Mesecon didn't point upwards in this case:)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: