Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SUGGESTION] Alternate actors for storage of components #89

Open
Ikabodo opened this issue Mar 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

[SUGGESTION] Alternate actors for storage of components #89

Ikabodo opened this issue Mar 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Ikabodo
Copy link

Ikabodo commented Mar 14, 2023

Description

Most adventurers would not carry large or heavy resources with them in the field. Many groups solve this by storing items in different kinds of loot sheets or actors. (Like item piles or lootsheet). It would be nice there was an option to choose an alternate actor where your components are when crafting. This way you wont have to drag them to your player to craft.

Benefit(s)

Less dragging and dropping for players.

Potential Implementation(s)

Maybe add to the player app?

@Ikabodo Ikabodo added enhancement New feature or request triage The Issue is not yet ready to work labels Mar 14, 2023
@misterpotts
Copy link
Owner

Yeah, the Actor crafting app is going to be the place for this. That's the eventual place where recipes will be able to be learned, searched and crafting triggered by users. Adding a place to drop additional component sources makes a lot of sense 👍🏻

@misterpotts misterpotts removed the triage The Issue is not yet ready to work label Mar 14, 2023
@misterpotts
Copy link
Owner

This was partially implemented in 0.9.0 as the API supports the operation, but the UI doesn't yet allow you to set a different source actor. I'll keep this open until that's done.

@misterpotts misterpotts self-assigned this Sep 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants