Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

lit-af doesn't have a port option #388

Open
Varunram opened this issue Sep 23, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

lit-af doesn't have a port option #388

Varunram opened this issue Sep 23, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
trivial Simple changes, not requiring extensive testing or inspection

Comments

@Varunram
Copy link
Contributor

Say we have tow running lit instances, if we connect one through the -dir flag, we can't attempt to connect to the other one via this as well since lit-af doesn't have a port param. Would be nice to have this as an option. Will put in a PR once existing ones are merged to avoid merge conflicts.
@delbonis
Copy link
Collaborator

Perhaps change it so that -p reflects the p2p port to connect to if a -dir flag is given.

@gertjaap
Copy link
Contributor

the -con parameter accepts a port. See #312 (comment)

@Varunram
Copy link
Contributor Author

I meant the -dir command itself doesn't have a port option. Its maybe a slight inconvenience to use the con option every time we run multiple clients on the same server I guess, hence the issue.

@delbonis delbonis added the trivial Simple changes, not requiring extensive testing or inspection label Nov 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
trivial Simple changes, not requiring extensive testing or inspection
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gertjaap @Varunram @delbonis