Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request to add StyleTTS 2 model #183

Open
Asten-Valentinus opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Request to add StyleTTS 2 model #183

Asten-Valentinus opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Asten-Valentinus
Copy link

Looking around, I've discovered the StyleTTS 2 model.

It seems to be of a much higher quality than other Voice Cloning TTS models, so I think it would be nice to support.

From the statistics mentioned in it's page, it seems to be a little more optimised than YourTTS, which is already supported by SpeechNote.

Alike to what SpeechNote does, it seems to work well when generated on a sentence-by-sentence basis. However, the quality degrades on smaller segments of text.

There is a sweet spot to maximize quality.

You can find the source here.

Thanks for the awesome program!

@mkiol
Copy link
Owner

mkiol commented Nov 24, 2024

Thanks for the recommendation. Adding to my TO-DO list.

BTW, Have you tested the Coqui XTTS model? In my opinion it is great, much better than YourTTS. Especially in version 2.0.2.

@mkiol mkiol added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 24, 2024
@Asten-Valentinus
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the recommendation. Adding to my TO-DO list.

BTW, Have you tested the Coqui XTTS model? In my opinion it is great, much better than YourTTS. Especially in version 2.0.2.

Yeah, I've tried it. It is certainly much better! I think Style TTS is higher quality than that though, the demos show it as pretty good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants