-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 881
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[resolver] invalid concurrent query count is misleading #2546
Comments
Same problem +1 system log output dockerd: time="2022-07-31T19:27:53.443961512+08:00" level=error msg="[resolver] invalid concurrent query count" and in docker-compose environment, harbor core error log: Jul 31 22:27:00 192.168.208.1 core[18652]: 2022-07-31T14:27:00Z [WARNING] [/common/utils/oidc/helper.go:63]: Failed to refresh configuration, error: failed to load OIDC setting: dial tcp: lookup <pgDomain>: Temporary failure in name resolution
Jul 31 22:27:04 192.168.208.1 core[18652]: 2022/07/31 14:27:04 #033[1;31m[E] [server.go:2774] dial tcp: lookup <redisDomain>: Temporary failure in name resolution#033[0m
Jul 31 22:27:10 192.168.208.1 core[18652]: 2022-07-31T14:27:10Z [WARNING] [/common/utils/oidc/helper.go:63]: Failed to refresh configuration, error: failed to load OIDC setting: dial tcp: lookup <pgDomain>: Temporary failure in name resolution
Jul 31 22:27:14 192.168.208.1 core[18652]: 2022/07/31 14:27:14 #033[1;31m[E] [server.go:2774] dial tcp: lookup <redisDomain>: Temporary failure in name resolution#033[0m
Jul 31 22:27:20 192.168.208.1 core[18652]: 2022-07-31T14:27:20Z [WARNING] [/common/utils/oidc/helper.go:63]: Failed to refresh configuration, error: failed to load OIDC setting: dial tcp: lookup <pgDomain>: Temporary failure in name resolution docker info output: # docker info
Client:
Context: default
Debug Mode: false
Plugins:
app: Docker App (Docker Inc., v0.9.1-beta3)
buildx: Build with BuildKit (Docker Inc., v0.5.1-docker)
Server:
Containers: 11
Running: 10
Paused: 0
Stopped: 1
Images: 39
Server Version: 19.03.5
Storage Driver: overlay2
Backing Filesystem: extfs
Supports d_type: true
Native Overlay Diff: true
Logging Driver: json-file
Cgroup Driver: systemd
Plugins:
Volume: local
Network: bridge host ipvlan macvlan null overlay
Log: awslogs fluentd gcplogs gelf journald json-file local logentries splunk syslog
Swarm: inactive
Runtimes: runc
Default Runtime: runc
Init Binary: docker-init
containerd version: 269548fa27e0089a8b8278fc4fc781d7f65a939b
runc version: ff819c7e9184c13b7c2607fe6c30ae19403a7aff
init version: fec3683
Security Options:
seccomp
Profile: default
Kernel Version: 3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64
Operating System: CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
OSType: linux
Architecture: x86_64
CPUs: 4
Total Memory: 7.638GiB
Name: ctnr.a254-48-61.prod.ali-bj-c
ID: L7DR:JNFK:XVH6:CIK3:2VJC:GBVO:RLZY:OWKD:XQX7:O5NS:PV4X:XVTA
Docker Root Dir: /var/lib/docker
Debug Mode: false
Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
Labels:
Experimental: false
Insecure Registries:
127.0.0.0/8
Registry Mirrors:
https://<xxxxxx.mirror.aliyuncs.com>/
Live Restore Enabled: false After restart dockerd service and restart docker-compose harbor-service-list, resolver error disappear |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
During runtime, we sometimes see the following error message in journalctl:
This leads to the assumption, that something with an internal resolver is wrong and there is a DNS issue. In fact, when checking the affected node and all containers running on that node when this error occurs, we can not detect any DNS issue at all.
Tested by: Running DNS queries inside the container and on the host directly.
I tried understanding the code where this error message is coming from:
https://github.com/moby/libnetwork/blob/master/resolver.go
For me, it looks like as soon as a query was processed, a counter for concurrent DNS queries is decreased by one:
And if the concurrent query count is already 0, the counter can not be decreased any more, hence an error is thrown. In my understanding, this has no effect on the function of the resolver, the queries still work. So throwing an error that there is an invalid concurrent query count is misleading. It leads to the assumption that something is not working right, although it just means that there are no more queries left to be processed.
Can someone please confirm that I am not totally wrong here?
If I'm right, I would like to suggest that the error message is adapted slightly, helping sys admins to judge the "error" better. Or maybe switch the level from "error" to "info" or not log something at all.
docker info:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: