-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
get_source_id break in both analyzer.C and ecal.C #3
Comments
Did you check in the root file whether the directory “info/active” exists? AP
|
Whick root file do you mean? There is no root file created in the output directory if that's the one I should look for. Magnus |
the ecal.C and analyzer.C use a root file (or chain) as an input for the calibration and analysis actions. In any case the _f_tmp->cd(“info/active”) command is trying to change directory… AP
|
It sounds like get_source_id is trying to access a path that doesn't exist, On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Auke Colijn [email protected]
|
Thank you all for your efforts! It turned out that there was something wrong on a more fundamental level with my daqana installation. It's still not working properly, but there is at least some data I can now start to have a look on. |
Something regarding the root installation? You should be more specific so On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Magnus Gienal [email protected]
|
So, the major issue was that my daqana file wasn't compiled correctly. After solving this I now at least get a .root file in the calibration folder. |
When running the daqprocessor_single_calibrate.py I get an error
*** Break *** segmentation violation
after both analyzer.C and ecal.C went into get_source_id. I figured out that the following lines seem to break down (which are identical in both files)
analyzer.C: line 822
ecal.C: line 144
_f_tmp->cd("info/active");
Peter also had a look at it but we couldn't figure out what's wrong, maybe the code is trying to get into the directory info/active which isn't there, but we don't know where it would be either. Has anyone encountered this before and knows a solution? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: