You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that, like me, many people use their ERCFs backwards, with the front pointing towards the back of the printer. This allows them to, for example, place filaments on top of the printer. The bad thing is that there is no possibility today of inverting the doors. So that, when you see the front of the printer, the sequence of extruders would be from left to right. Is this feasible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd certainly entertain a PR for this but it would be very low priority for me to work on... just too much testing.
It's probably not a complex change. Any reference to self.gate_selected and self.tool_selected would need to be changed to call function that applied the inversion. But there would be a lot of places to test.
Yes, I would probably make a parameter of a macro, inverted gates. And when I was going to get the position of the tool or the gate I would do, NUMBER OF GATES - CURRENT GATE
I noticed that, like me, many people use their ERCFs backwards, with the front pointing towards the back of the printer. This allows them to, for example, place filaments on top of the printer. The bad thing is that there is no possibility today of inverting the doors. So that, when you see the front of the printer, the sequence of extruders would be from left to right. Is this feasible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: