You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
These notes are based on my meeting with Rob Miller yesterday.
We don't need to support every possible kind of visualization, but it may be good to support a few additional basic types like bar charts, pie graphs, and tables. These appear to be popular on STMO. That said, I'd like to verify this for myself. I'd like to prioritize the visualization types that are most popular on STMO.
We ideally want to change as little as possible, but we can consider switching to a different charting library like Plotly or Chart.js if it would make our work significantly easier.
This will start as exploratory work. We're most interested in how easy it is to add support for new visualization types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
These notes are based on my meeting with Rob Miller yesterday.
We don't need to support every possible kind of visualization, but it may be good to support a few additional basic types like bar charts, pie graphs, and tables. These appear to be popular on STMO. That said, I'd like to verify this for myself. I'd like to prioritize the visualization types that are most popular on STMO.
We ideally want to change as little as possible, but we can consider switching to a different charting library like Plotly or Chart.js if it would make our work significantly easier.
This will start as exploratory work. We're most interested in how easy it is to add support for new visualization types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: