Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
That is an excellent question. I don't know yet. Ideally, we'd have a release candidate beforehand, but this also comes with additional drawbacks:
I/We will definitely not wait for any particular PR to be merged. If it is merged before the release is drafted, fine, but if not 1.5 will be released without it. Waiting on individual (non-critical) PRs just introduces "release hell" where one waits on one PR after an other and therefore never releases.
I want to release Mumble versions much more frequently (~ every half year) and provide continuous nightly builds that serve as a replacement for release candidates. However, this requires reducing the overhead required to draft releases significantly (e.g. by automating most parts), but for this to happen someone will have to have the time to work on that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@Krzmbrzl I have seen you mention the release of the 1.5.x series multiple times now. How do you plan to handle this? Will there be (semi)-public release candidates before the final version? Since I worked on a lot of stuff for 1.5.x, I would love dogfooding my own changes so I can fix problems before a gazillion people already have it rolled out ;)
What about the accessibility patch series? It would be a shame, if they landed in 1.6 because they contain GUI changes.
Anything else you want to change about the Mumble release cycle?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions