Compilation instructions for Ubuntu - missing dependencies #1143
Replies: 15 comments
-
Do you know which release of ubuntu? As for the rest of the problems I pretty much agree. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It was 19.10 (Ubuntu studio), but I remember having the same problem on my Mint (based on Ubuntu 18.04). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The other missing dep was liblrdf0-dev. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Deleted it, we have enough trouble keeping one README file up to date :P |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Should we add liblilv-dev and liblrdf0-dev to the apt-get install list in README or is there a reason they are not in? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Go ahead and update it if that is all that is needed.
These dependencies were quite recently added, we had our own versions of
these libs before but I think Tim changed it since it turned out hard to
maintain.
Den mån 16 dec. 2019 kl 19:54 skrev kybos <[email protected]>:
… Should we add liblilv-dev and liblrdf0-dev to the apt-get install list in
README or is there a reason they are not in?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/orgs/muse-sequencer/teams/musedevteam/discussions/16/comments/5?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABCFAN664WBP6QNQ3WXOS6TQY7FHTA5CNFSM4J3GLCHKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWNCGS43DOVZXG2LPNZIG643UKJSXA3DZVJRW63LNMVXHIX3JMTHAAAUA6M>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCFAN7NZLN5ENO4AKSHTADQY7FHTANCNFSM4J3GLCHA>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Deb: Isn't this what we're looking for? liblilv-dev yes. Required by our LV2 module. librdf: No, not required at the moment. You can leave it out. It basically does nothing for now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Let's get rid of: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It's the 3.0.2 release which is now available in most Debian-based distros. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Den mån 16 dec. 2019 kl 20:43 skrev kybos <[email protected]>:
Deb: Isn't this what we're looking for?
https://packages.debian.org/buster/muse
It's the 3.0.2 release which is now available in most Debian-based distros.
The .deb or appimage idea went more in direction of more up-to-date
(pre-)releases. Typically it takes very long to get current app release
into Debian/Ubuntu., especially the Ubuntu LTS releases...
The idea with appimage is pretty good, providing a distribution independent
version of applications.
There is also flatpak and there is actually a muse build for flatpak:
https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.musesequencer.Muse3
But on my system it does not seem to work, I haven't researched why but I'm
thinking it might be too much to ask of an application that needs rather
low level access to other parts of your operating system.. jack, alsa etc.
Linux is dependency sensitive as it is...
—
… You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/orgs/muse-sequencer/teams/musedevteam/discussions/16/comments/9?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABCFANZGU4FSOZZXJHXMCCTQY7K6PA5CNFSM4J3GLCHKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWNCGS43DOVZXG2LPNZIG643UKJSXA3DZVJRW63LNMVXHIX3JMTHAAAUBA4>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCFANZKATWBDGSMILZAPZ3QY7K6PANCNFSM4J3GLCHA>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Tried flatpak. The site warned that I can only install via the GUI that comes with my distro. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am a little sceptical about hybrid solutions like flatpak and snap, never liked them (they install kind of subsytems on which the apps depend). AppImage is different in that it is truly self-contained. QTractor uses it as well for the distribution of new releases, so that should be proof enough that it also works for resource-critical applications. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
PRCS is some obscure versioning system (and prj its file extension). It's outdated (same as the .pro file for QtCreator), so hardly of any use. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not convinced there is a difference in the approaches, but I know too little and if it works for QTractor that is good news! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm all for cleaning these old files out. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Someone I recommended MusE to complained that the compilation instructions for Ubuntu lead to error. We got out that there are missing dependencies in the installation list for apt-get in the README.
One of them was "liblilv-dev", the other one I forgot but will try to get out (putting it down so I don't forget).
More feedback I got:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions