New release talk #1175
Replies: 12 comments
-
I would suggest getting out a small maintenance release (3.1.1), as the Arch guy in the ticket suggested. And leaving the switch to the new theme for 3.2 (if you both agree with this switch). There are still some areas I wanted to improve/extend in the new theme, and we still have to clarify the Qt style issues (I would like to avoid seeing my theme broken by incompatible Qt styles ;-) ). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
BTW: Even if we set the new theme as the default for some future release, existing users won't notice - I guess we are not going to overwrite their settings (where their current theme is stored), are we? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We will just do a maintenance release and push for all minor fixes then. No we shouldn't force the theme. If people actually care about themes and colors, they will just be annoyed if their settings are overwritten. What about forceing the qt style? Should we remove or make it harder to change qt-style? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Agreed.
I would definitely force the Fusion style for the new theme to avoid unnecessary issues, like Breeze/Oxygen ignoring some stylesheet directives and causing misalignments. I see 2 options:
I remember you mentioned another option, also removing the Qt-styles from the UI but keep them in the config file and let the user edit it there if he is really adamant about it. Would be OK with me, but let the user edit the xml config file could be a little dangerous, easy to break, causing more issues... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Remember, the mechanism to force existing settings to change |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@spamatica |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Indeed, seems like a good idea :D
In totally unrelated news (not news). Nobody noticed that lately we seem to
have added ten year old fixes?
That is, if you go by the changelog ;)
Den tors 25 juni 2020 kl 19:56 skrev kybos <[email protected]>:
… @spamatica <https://github.com/spamatica>
Maybe you could add updating the MusE wikipedia page to your release
checklist ;-).
I updated it after the 3.1 release, the release and also the MusE web
address were obsolete.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/orgs/muse-sequencer/teams/musedevteam/discussions/49/comments/6>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCFANYMIMQX3HRA6Y7CVIDRYOFVXANCNFSM4OGAVF3Q>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Right, and it seems to be me who started it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ha! I already fixed some before, now more? Tsk tsk ;-) Finishing up my controller graph fixes... Hopefully this works, took a while... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
OK That was what I wanted to get in there. I'll take a peek at the compressed file problem and the wave editing problem. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My fault. Tests OK now, loading and saving. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My fault again. Tests OK using the editor functions on writeable and non-writeable (C.O.W.) files. Two more things:
Issues filed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I saw you asked about our status Tim.
Well... erratic at best ;)
I got lots of things I want to work on but nothing I can recall that holds up a release. Besides waiting for me is a fools game ;)
I'm all FOR making a release.
Can we do the necessary changes to make the Dark Flat theme the default in that case? I think that would be cool, unless you think it's too early for that?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions