You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is not ideal. In the end it's not a big cost, but estimating the distortions from the fieldmaps is the slowest thing in preprocessing so re-working this would save some computation time. I'm pretty sure it's deterministic but haven't confirmed — if not, it's a bigger problem. But improving this would involve a fairly large reorganization of how things work, so we might just have to live with it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe an easy solution is to add an experiment-level iterable in preprocessing and perform timeseries operations over it. This will duplicate data storage for the session templates, but not computation.
The previous idea will not work. I explored it, but ultimately the experiment name is a property of the Info dictionary that gets passed to the preprocessing workflow. It doesn't seem possible to nest experiments at the correct level within the iterable structure.
This is not ideal. In the end it's not a big cost, but estimating the distortions from the fieldmaps is the slowest thing in preprocessing so re-working this would save some computation time. I'm pretty sure it's deterministic but haven't confirmed — if not, it's a bigger problem. But improving this would involve a fairly large reorganization of how things work, so we might just have to live with it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: