From c9958f5133da050ba79cacb18aed6c9fe240f020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Max Inden Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:20:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] docs(roadmap): Remove bitswap entry We will not implement Bitswap anytime soon. See https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/issues/2632#issuecomment-1309147441 for rational. --- ROADMAP.md | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/ROADMAP.md b/ROADMAP.md index 61a3c876a89..8435118b489 100644 --- a/ROADMAP.md +++ b/ROADMAP.md @@ -199,20 +199,6 @@ requested from any rust-libp2p users. Long term, given that this will give us a great performance gain, we should definitely tackle it. It also allows us to catch up and thus be consistent with go-libp2p. -### Bitswap implementation - -| Category | Status | Target Completion | Tracking | Dependencies | Dependents | -|----------|--------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------------|------------| -| | todo | | https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/issues/2632 | | | - -I think this is a common component that many users need to build peer-to-peer applications. In -addition, it is very performance critical and thus likely challenges many of our existing designs in -rust-libp2p. - -I would prioritize it below [handshake optimization](#handshake-optimizations) following the -convention of improving existing components over introducing new ones. Users have and can implement -their own implementations and are thus not blocked on the rust-libp2p project. - ### WebTransport | Category | Status | Target Completion | Tracking | Dependencies | Dependents |