You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, thanks for the amazing work!
I have a question about the confidence loss introduced in the paper and code.
You mentioned that you compute it only over valid pixels. If I understated correctly, for example, the sky points are not valid since there is no ground truth depth, however in the visualization it looks like the confidence of the sky points is low. Could you please explain how you achieved low confidence for the sky points, are you using any additional loss for the invalid points?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, thanks for the amazing work!
I have a question about the confidence loss introduced in the paper and code.
You mentioned that you compute it only over valid pixels. If I understated correctly, for example, the sky points are not valid since there is no ground truth depth, however in the visualization it looks like the confidence of the sky points is low. Could you please explain how you achieved low confidence for the sky points, are you using any additional loss for the invalid points?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: