Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 13, 2022. It is now read-only.

Parsing LRMI data from Khan Academy resources #31

Open
joehobson opened this issue Aug 1, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Parsing LRMI data from Khan Academy resources #31

joehobson opened this issue Aug 1, 2014 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@joehobson
Copy link
Member

I was trying to find sets of resources in the LR to put into FREE and had some trouble locating the Khan Academy resources that Jim Klo published in March 2013. It turns out that they are in the LR, but the widget doesn't do a great job parsing all of their data.

Example resource (actually published twice): https://node02.public.learningregistry.net/obtain?by_doc_ID=false&request_id=http://www.khanacademy.org/exercise/angle_addition_postulate

I created a widget including just khanacademy.org and excluding EUN to keep their crap from polluting the results: http://www.navigationnorth.com/khan-lr-resources/

Properties that we don't seem to be seeing in the widget:

  • CCSS alignments
  • Name
  • Subject
  • keywords in the LRMI

You probably just need to update the schema parsing to get it to find these values. Doesn't look like these records have description field, unfortunately.

@serpentblade
Copy link
Contributor

The format of that metadata is awful. The example you gave me doesn't have any keywords included nor any explicitly defined subject.

@joehobson
Copy link
Member Author

I think this is an early version of LRMI use in the LR. Definitely not the best, but i wouldn't be surprised if we found other examples that look similar. Actually, after comparing it to a record published by EasyPublish, it's not that different (example) -- at least those published prior to the last round of updates to the tool -- which makes sense given that Jim Klo worked on both. You're right, no subject or keywords in that record, so here are more examples.

Here's a Khan resource with a description, keywords, other properties: https://node02.public.learningregistry.net/obtain?by_doc_ID=true&request_id=3fa983ded750470f8e92498c003c1f1c

As a sidenote, since you updated EasyPublish, the format of published records (example) changed significantly. We should probably update the keyword used when publishing from "EZPublish-1.0" so that we can differentiate.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants