-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
github release for a simple binary #24
Comments
Here's the
This produces a |
BTW the main reason is that I don't want a toolchain in most of my containers. |
I suppose a pre-compiled static binary may make sense. |
There's little reason to make it static. glibc's ABI is versioned and quite sensible, and
If built on something suitable like Centos 6 it'll run fine on anything up from there. glibc defaults to using symbol versioning which makes it safer too:
|
Here is the fork which provided binary release:
static-linked glibc release isn't provided because it is buggy:
all of these works for dynamic-linked |
Hi folks
It'd be very useful if a prebuilt binary for
su-exec
could be published on the github releases page here.People who choose trust the repo can reasonably trust a binary uploaded to the repo's releases page too. Unless they link to a specific git commithash when they fetch su-exec.c and the makefile, and unless they review the whole thing whenever they change which git revision they build, they're trusting the repo anyway.
The vast majority of uses would be satisfied by an amd64 binary built for glibc 2.12 - for CentOS / RHEL 6.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: