Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development Service Provider Listing (Filters, Rearrangement) #517

Open
NicoleNitschke opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #528
Open

Development Service Provider Listing (Filters, Rearrangement) #517

NicoleNitschke opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #528
Assignees

Comments

@NicoleNitschke
Copy link
Contributor

NicoleNitschke commented Jul 26, 2023

The discussed results from #504 will be implemented in this issue.

Design

Above-the-fold content

The header image on the service provider list should be smaller, because it is not really relating to the content on the page. We can't eliminate it completely, so we make it less high instead.
The map is a beloved feature of the service provider list and should not be hidden under the long list. It should be placed right beside the service provider list instead. This way, the map and the list with its filters are visible above the fold.

Filters

The following things from #504 should be realized as described in the issue:

  • replace ninja icon with text
  • search icon inside input
  • stretch filters about the whole width of the line
  • fix mobile layout (filters are currently broken)

The list view button should not be removed as described in #504. There will be another list behind this button instead. The new list view should become a more comparable charakter.

Listing itself

Sorting the list by the amount of Neos support in terms of money and Neos team members is not desired by all, as it is not considered fair by all. It was discussed that sorting the list would bring in more money, which could be used for further marketing to make Neos better known, but for some this goes against the essence of Neos (humility and equality). Therefore, design changes such as larger badges, color highlighting or different borders are now to be used instead to visualize the different forms of support.

Further ideas for later realization:

  • mobile view: map panel with overlay
  • filter changes the map
  • survey, if changing order would increase service provider support
@NicoleNitschke NicoleNitschke converted this from a draft issue Jul 26, 2023
@NicoleNitschke NicoleNitschke changed the title Umsetzung Service Provider Listing Logik (Filter, Sortierung) Development Service Provider Listing (Filters, Rearrangement) Jul 26, 2023
@mhsdesign
Copy link
Member

The map is a beloved feature of the service provider list and should not be hidden under the long list. It should be placed right beside the service provider list instead. This way, the map and the list with its filters are visible above the fold.

Idk if left right really looks better ... (i cheated a bit and removed icons as well as made the cards smaller)

image

Some examples if found:

image image

NicoleNitschke pushed a commit to NicoleNitschke/Neos.NeosIo that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2023
NicoleNitschke pushed a commit to NicoleNitschke/Neos.NeosIo that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2023
@NicoleNitschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mhsdesign Yes, i don't think, that the map beside is a better solution, so I didn't change this layout yet. But I made first little changes in this PR: #528

NicoleNitschke pushed a commit to NicoleNitschke/Neos.NeosIo that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2023
@crydotsnake crydotsnake linked a pull request Sep 8, 2023 that will close this issue
NicoleNitschke pushed a commit to NicoleNitschke/Neos.NeosIo that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2023
NicoleNitschke pushed a commit to NicoleNitschke/Neos.NeosIo that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2023
NicoleNitschke pushed a commit to NicoleNitschke/Neos.NeosIo that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2023
NicoleNitschke pushed a commit to NicoleNitschke/Neos.NeosIo that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2023
Sebobo pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
Sebobo pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
Sebobo pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
Sebobo pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Todo 🎫
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants