Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restructure repo #806

Open
edmundmiller opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Restructure repo #806

edmundmiller opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@edmundmiller
Copy link
Contributor

Might break some stuff.

@jfy133 anythoughts on moving to a structure similar to the modules repo?

$ tree conf/utd_ganymede/
conf/utd_ganymede/
├── utd_ganymede.config
└── utd_ganymede.md

Maybe a better example

$ tree conf/uppmax/
conf/uppmax/
├── README.md
├── pipeline
│   ├── ampliseq.config
│   └── ampliseq.md
└── uppmax.config

Could nest the ampliseq one more time too.

@jfy133
Copy link
Member

jfy133 commented Nov 24, 2024

Theoretically no reason not to, but it would break the website rendering currently I imagine.

What would the benefits be though?

I don't see an issue between configs/modules having different structures because they are entirely different things

@edmundmiller
Copy link
Contributor Author

Benefit would be it might be easier to find stuff, and see what's supported for a given HPC system.

Most users have access to one or a few of the systems in this list, and they probably want to find what pipelines are supported, not the other way around, of one person looking to run one pipeline across multiple systems.

I think it feels written from the perspective of pipeline developers, when in reality I think this repo is for users/admins of these systems.

@jfy133
Copy link
Member

jfy133 commented Nov 30, 2024

That's fair!

@maxulysse whatchuthink?

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member

Looks neat

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member

I think it feels written from the perspective of pipeline developers, when in reality I think this repo is for users/admins of these systems.

How did you guess?
I did really create that for me, for a certain pipeline as a pipeline developer...

@jfy133
Copy link
Member

jfy133 commented Nov 30, 2024

Then let's wait for @mashehu to come back from baby-ing so we don't accidently break the website

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants