You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
I hope to get help or maybe better an explanation of the following issue. I have run the nanoseq pipeline using standard settings on a couple of samples in the meantime. I'm interested in the counts per chromosome but by chance I realized, that the counts differ between samtools (.idxstats in the samtools output or the raw index counts of the mutliqc report) and the bambu output counts_gene.txt if gene counts for each chromosome are summed. Not too much, but the numbers do differ. I'm a bit confused why this is the case and would be happy for suggestions which statistic is the more accurate or more reliable.
Thanks!
Command used and terminal output
No response
Relevant files
No response
System information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description of the bug
Hello,
I hope to get help or maybe better an explanation of the following issue. I have run the nanoseq pipeline using standard settings on a couple of samples in the meantime. I'm interested in the counts per chromosome but by chance I realized, that the counts differ between samtools (.idxstats in the samtools output or the raw index counts of the mutliqc report) and the bambu output counts_gene.txt if gene counts for each chromosome are summed. Not too much, but the numbers do differ. I'm a bit confused why this is the case and would be happy for suggestions which statistic is the more accurate or more reliable.
Thanks!
Command used and terminal output
No response
Relevant files
No response
System information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: