You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we have one palette that uses a handful of the colours from the Identity (Blue, Green, Red, Purple, Orange), and then the levels as defined by the Identity (Blues, Neutrals, Support Greens, Highlights).
Should we create some more named palettes? Perhaps a RAG palette? Are the existing palettes suitable, or could they be improved?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Appreciate I am late to the party but this is something I have been looking at recently.
If we refer to the colour palettes in the NHS Identity it seems like the ones in this package do not align properly:
Would we be better defining our colour palettes as above ^ instead of the of the colour sections (e.g. Level 1: NHS blues, Level 2: NHS neutrals, etc):
Then this would enable you to recreate all of the colour palettes in the identity (core blues + pale neutrals, greens + black + dark grey, highlights) and also custom palettes by combining in a different way.
The default could then be core blues + pale neutrals
I think you are probably right - these are much nicer descriptions! If you want to create a PR I will approve and merge :-) Might be worth having both set's of names unless that would cause confusion...
Currently we have one palette that uses a handful of the colours from the Identity (Blue, Green, Red, Purple, Orange), and then the levels as defined by the Identity (Blues, Neutrals, Support Greens, Highlights).
Should we create some more named palettes? Perhaps a RAG palette? Are the existing palettes suitable, or could they be improved?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: