Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider to switch from prettytable-rs to a different library #21

Open
alcir opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Consider to switch from prettytable-rs to a different library #21

alcir opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@alcir
Copy link

alcir commented Oct 16, 2024

Disclaimer: I'm not a developer. I'm just reporting the words of someone who really understands the topic1.

Note that the "prettytable-rs" crate is pretty much dead, and it's already slightly broken with the latest versions of its dependencies.
You might want to switch to a different library.

Thank you for your efforts.

Footnotes

  1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315416#c6

@nidnogg
Copy link
Owner

nidnogg commented Oct 30, 2024

Heya! I appreciate the pointer and I am very open to this, as long as we can keep the dependency tree similarly lean or potentially even leaner. Perhaps porting over just the features zeitfetch needs from that lib (⚠️ and only that) could make for an interesting sub. I was unaware that prettytable-rs had become unmaintained.

PS: were you the one who suggested zeitfetch for the fedora reps by any chance? If so, thank you! It's very cool to see it available elsewhere other than brew or cargo which I maintain.

@alcir
Copy link
Author

alcir commented Nov 15, 2024

were you the one who suggested zeitfetch for the fedora reps by any chance?

Yes I am. :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants