You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found that my simulated reach volumes at some reaches are larger than maximum lake storage. I guess it is more reasonable to control it below the storage. In my implementation, I modified section "#updating the storage" in lake_route.f90 by simply limiting the storage to min(RCHFLX_out(iens,segIndex)%REACH_VOL(1), RPARAM_in(segIndex)%D03_MaxStorage), but this is only applied when maxstorage is supplied and larger than 1 (1 basically means it does not follow this fill-spill scheme). As for remaining water, it should be added to downstream
Hope this makes sense. Thanks
Zhi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ekluzek
pushed a commit
to ekluzek/mizuRoute
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2022
Hello,
I found that my simulated reach volumes at some reaches are larger than maximum lake storage. I guess it is more reasonable to control it below the storage. In my implementation, I modified section "#updating the storage" in lake_route.f90 by simply limiting the storage to min(RCHFLX_out(iens,segIndex)%REACH_VOL(1), RPARAM_in(segIndex)%D03_MaxStorage), but this is only applied when maxstorage is supplied and larger than 1 (1 basically means it does not follow this fill-spill scheme). As for remaining water, it should be added to downstream
Hope this makes sense. Thanks
Zhi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: