Is there any homebrew formula for it

[murarisumit]

I don't see any homebrew formula for gita, do we have any plans to have homebrew formula for it.

I can work on it, thought of confirming before I start on it.

[nosarthur]

I don't use homebrew often. What's the advantage over

pip install -U gita?

[murarisumit]

@nosarthur so haven't personally worked on homebrew formula for python applications, but from user point of view, i find homebrew like apt for mac which makes it easy to list/install/upgrade packages for my system independent of languages.

[nosarthur]

I see. I haven't thought about generating a homebrew formula.

Please feel free to create it. Thanks for your help!

[dzhou-schrodinger]

Hi, @murarisumit
When you finish, please update the README.md to include the brew install gita command, thanks!

[murarisumit]

Ah, thanks @nosarthur, will create and update readme. Thanks for comment

[jeebak]

@murarisumit I was curious about this so I did a little research. Using brew edit black as an example, and this resource: https://docs.brew.sh/Python-for-Formula-Authors the following minimal brew formula seems to be working:

class Gita < Formula
  include Language::Python::Virtualenv

  desc "Manage many git repos with sanity 从容管理多个git库"
  homepage "https://github.com/nosarthur/gita"
  url "https://github.com/nosarthur/gita/archive/refs/tags/v0.16.2.tar.gz"
  sha256 "a292ac7e7dbf36959e9a0e349a2a672a480dfe5dab03d87b53fc552ee070a2af"
  license "MIT"
  head "https://github.com/nosarthur/gita.git", branch: "master"

  depends_on "[email protected]"

  def install
    virtualenv_install_with_resources
  end

  test do
    system "false"
  end
end

EDIT: bumped version down to [email protected] based on #80 (comment)

[nosarthur]

maybe instead of 3.10, use 3.6? or from 3.6 to 3.9? I actually know 3.10 doesn't work due to the async library API change, #91