-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: Add a profile or a switch which makes no change on the existing route #834
Comments
Hello, If you intend to change an existing track you should "upload" your track as a route (==>load + load track as route). |
But this is the problem: If I load the track (which I have modified the day before) as a route, most of my modifications are not in afterwards. |
When you load the GPS as track, then you see your changes? |
Sorry for the inconvenience! The mapper set "access=no" probably to stop cars, but a cycle_route exists, proving that bikes are allowed. The problem is, the standard trekking-profile set an "accesspenalty" of 15 on that segment, and this causes the routing error. To bypass the bugs in the trekking profile I created an own profile that you can test / use in my instance: (or start the instance and choose the "trekkingrad (mit Optionen)" |
Thank you very much for your assistance. But I think, you will never get a 100% correct map. So it is good, if errors are reported and lead to a better next release. I tried your suggestion above (slider at very left position, trekkingrad mit Optionen) and still several details are different from my original track. My goal is something else and I am not sure, if you really understand what I mean: For example if I decide make a change on the route and want to carry my bike over some steps this is possible. But if I open this modified gpx again this modification is not in, because always a complete new routing starts after loading. In my opinion it should be easy to give the option to load the gpx as it is. Of course afterwards the possibility to make further modifications which is not possible if I load it only as a track (and in this case it is also not possible to see the route details like length and terrain profile). |
If you already created the track with brouter-web, you can just store the URL as bookmark and continue working on it by loading the bookmark and updating it to save your improvements. |
@zod : Thank you, this is indeed a workaround. Not very elegant as the as the bookmark has the standard name Brouter and it is also not useful if I want to take an older track as starting point for something new. So on long term view I would prefer my original suggestion. |
This is the point! If you intend to make longer changes, then the method is to "simplify" the track first in N route-points, and then to recalculate the route that follow the N points. The recalculation is based on the current active profile, that for, the choose of the profile is essential and must correspond to the initial track-creation- if you created your initial track manually with an "own" routing, you have no chance to recreate it exactly with a routing engine. (the Routeconverter supporst also this approach with the option "convert track to route" that uses the same Utility (standard "simplify" programm) as Brouter-web for converting) |
A further remark on your example above by "Bad Wimpfen": |
Not sure if this is the right place. In general I like very much the routing (Trekkingrad Original), in areas I know very well it is often very close to my favorite route. But I have a problem adjusting longer routes which are not ready on the same day. I start with the automatic solution and make some own modifications, download the file. Next day I load the file to make further modifications and several of the changes I made the day before are gone. If I load the only the track (not as route) the formerly changes are still in, but I cannot make further modifications. A profile or a switch which makes no modifications to the fresh loaded GPX would solve this problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: