Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can no longer import runtime providers (in 1.8.0) #1474

Closed
remihuigen opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Can no longer import runtime providers (in 1.8.0) #1474

remihuigen opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@remihuigen
Copy link

remihuigen commented Sep 6, 2024

I was using this configuration, which broke in v1.8.0, since @nuxt/image/dist/runtime/providers/cloudinary is no longer found.

image: {
    provider: 'cloudinary',
    cloudinary: {
      baseURL: baseConfig.api.cloudinary + '/image/upload/',
      modifiers: {
        quality: '80',
      }
    },
    providers: {
        video: {
            provider: '@nuxt/image/dist/runtime/providers/cloudinary',
            options: {
                baseURL: baseConfig.api.cloudinary + '/video/upload/'
            }
        }
    }
  }
Pre-transform error: Failed to resolve import "/Users/remihuigen/local-projects/clients-onderwijsin/onderwijsin-nuxt/@nuxt/image/dist/runtime/providers/cloudinary" from "virtual:nuxt:/Users/remihuigen/local-projects/clients-onderwijsin/onderwijsin-nuxt/.nuxt/image-options.mjs". Does the file exist?  

Up until 1.7.0 this worked fine

Basically, what I'm trying to achieve is having an alt cloudinary provider with /video/upload/ in it's baseUrl, so I can use images for video files by using the alternate provider.

Any suggestions?

@Baroshem
Copy link
Collaborator

Hmm, strange. I can still see this file in the node modules:
node_modules/@nuxt/image/dist/runtime/providers/cloudinary.js

Maybe you need to add an extension .js? Not sure as I have not done things like these.

If this won't work, could you create a reproduction link? :)

Copy link
Contributor

Would you be able to provide a reproduction? 🙏

More info

Why do I need to provide a reproduction?

Reproductions make it possible for us to triage and fix issues quickly with a relatively small team. It helps us discover the source of the problem, and also can reveal assumptions you or we might be making.

What will happen?

If you've provided a reproduction, we'll remove the label and try to reproduce the issue. If we can, we'll mark it as a bug and prioritise it based on its severity and how many people we think it might affect.

If needs reproduction labeled issues don't receive any substantial activity (e.g., new comments featuring a reproduction link), we'll close them. That's not because we don't care! At any point, feel free to comment with a reproduction and we'll reopen it.

How can I create a reproduction?

We have a template for starting with a minimal reproduction:

👉 https://stackblitz.com/github/nuxt/image/tree/main/example

A public GitHub repository is also perfect. 👌

Please ensure that the reproduction is as minimal as possible. See more details in our guide.

You might also find these other articles interesting and/or helpful:

@remihuigen
Copy link
Author

Adding the .js extension doesn't resolve the issue unfortunately

Here's a reproduction:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/github-xuh6accr

Note that if you set @nuxt/image to 1.7.0, everything works. But upgrading to ^1.8.0 results in an import error

@danielroe
Copy link
Member

we do not expose the providers individually via subpath exports.

you should be able to specify provider: 'cloudinary' though - is there a reason this isn't working?

@remihuigen
Copy link
Author

Didn't know you could do that! Thanks, that works :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants