-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
README file suggestion #550
Comments
Hey 👋
I suppose you're referring to the fact that Lua must be executable using the lua command? This will be solved (and the note can then be removed) when #386 has been implemented.
Yep, I can see how the wording is confusing there. I'll update that. We have shifted out focus to writing our own luarocks package manager (#539), which is capable of installing lua (+ headers) as needed. |
OK good to know. The below is what I have and it works fine for whatever reason. It sounds like this will be a moot point later on. Thanks for (base) ➜ ~ which lua |
Requesting clarification of this snip from the README:
"A lua 5.1 or luajit installation, including headers (for luarocks). Note that Lua must be executable using the lua command."
It starts out fine, one thing or the other, but then by then end the "other thing" seems to be required after all (the "or" got transformed into an "and"). The strange thing is it seems everything works if typing
lua
executes any Lua, such as Lua 5.4, and luajit is installed. This is not made clear, and if true, is a useful thing to know.Regarding headers, I can't tell if this refers to Lua 5.1 headers needed for luarocks, luajit headers needed for luarocks, or luarocks headers needed for something else. I didn't do anything special about headers and things worked, perhaps they already were installed. In any case can we clarify what these headers are about?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: