Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Enhance the transaction type filtering feature #1717

Open
1 of 4 tasks
csillag opened this issue Jan 29, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 4 tasks

[Feature]: Enhance the transaction type filtering feature #1717

csillag opened this issue Jan 29, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@csillag
Copy link
Contributor

csillag commented Jan 29, 2025

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

SUMMARY

We want to add 3 new sub-features to transaction filtering

DESCRIPTION

Filtering for transaction type has been introduced in #1679. (Issue: #1636)

There are three more things we would like to add to this feature:

  • On consensus, when the list of possible types is very long, it would be nice if we could search the list by typing.
  • We would like to be able to select (and filter for) multiple types at once. (Depends on Nexus support, Support filtering transaction by multiple method types nexus#877 )
  • In the filter list, we would like to be able to display the number of matches for each type. (Depends on Nexus support)

Off of these additions has been discussed with @donouwens (for design), and where appropriate, also @ptrus (for Nexus support).

@csillag csillag added the feature New feature or request label Jan 29, 2025
@donouwens
Copy link
Collaborator

@csillag Please find the designs for the three mentioned additional features below. DM me for Figma link, please.

Filter default
Image

Filter active
Image

Filter search
Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants