From 8f19d02e94785da0e096931cb39242fcb9d98434 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ID Bot Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 01:24:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Script updating archive at 2023-11-26T01:24:56Z. [ci skip] --- archive.json | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/archive.json b/archive.json index 80ac8b3f..2c5e865a 100644 --- a/archive.json +++ b/archive.json @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { "magic": "E!vIA5L86J2I", - "timestamp": "2023-11-23T01:20:25.047021+00:00", + "timestamp": "2023-11-26T01:24:42.248628+00:00", "repo": "oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc", "labels": [ { @@ -4174,7 +4174,7 @@ "labels": [], "body": "received a question. What is the correct format with a SD-JWT VC that has no disclosures but has a holder binding JWT. Is it \r\n`~~ (double tilde)`, or `~ (single tilde)`\r\nI think it is `~ (single tilde)` but the spec could probably clarify.", "createdAt": "2023-11-07T09:39:52Z", - "updatedAt": "2023-11-16T06:18:44Z", + "updatedAt": "2023-11-24T07:38:44Z", "closedAt": null, "comments": [ { @@ -4225,6 +4225,13 @@ "body": "> FWIW, the following are the various permutations as intended by the current spec (as best I understand anyway).\n> \n> SD-JWT without disclosures and without KB JWT:\n> `~`\n> \n> SD-JWT without disclosures and with KB JWT: \n> `~`\n> \n> SD-JWT with disclosures and without KB JWT:\n> `~~~`\n> \n> SD-JWT with disclosures and with KB JWT: \n> `~~~`\n\nIt could be valuable to list these four basic categories in the specification", "createdAt": "2023-11-16T06:18:44Z", "updatedAt": "2023-11-16T06:18:44Z" + }, + { + "author": "AltmannPeter", + "authorAssociation": "NONE", + "body": "> It could be valuable to list these four basic categories in the specification\r\n\r\nAgreed. Thanks for the clarification too!", + "createdAt": "2023-11-24T07:38:43Z", + "updatedAt": "2023-11-24T07:38:43Z" } ] },