Add new conf-gcc-multilib package #26991
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
goblint-cil.2.0.5 does some optional compilation based on whether
cpp -m32andcpp -m64work, so it might make sense for it to have an optional dependency on such conf-gcc-multilib package.ocaml-option-32bit.1 has an explicit depext for gcc-multilib (and also g++-multilib). In the spirit of #20793 it might also make sense for the depext to be delegated to a conf-* package.
So this is my attempt at making such package, although I'm not particularly confident about it. Most non-debian-based distributions don't seem to offer such a package (or I couldn't easily find one).
Also I'm not too sure about the build checks being general/flexible/necessary.
Thus, this is very open to feedback.
EDIT: I did some digging to find packages for more distros, although it made me realize that perhaps gcc-multilib itself is the odd one out. It might be 32bit glibc that I've really aimed at here.