-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TC-wide discussion on symbology and annotation #29
Comments
I'm not entirely sure what this is getting at or where it comes from. What I can do is give you my perspective of where I think we are at, based on my work on the Portrayal Concept Development Study.
|
OGC should take a look at CSS for feature styling. CSS is used by SVG today, perhaps it is not too far from being a useful vocabulary for map features? If it is not suitable for geographic feature styling, why not? Can we address those issues with the W3C community? I think it's important to recognize overlapping standards from other domains and not 'reinvent the wheel' where possible, and CSS has global adoption already (maybe that makes it impossible to change, but we should assess that). |
This is not a new idea. In fact, in this decade alone MapBox has developed and abandoned CartoCSS, a CSS-based language. https://blog.mapbox.com/the-end-of-cartocss-da2d7427cf1 |
Not all old ideas are bad ideas :-) I believe CartoCSS is still in use by Carto. Anyway, Tom identifies two issues with CartoCSS:
I'm sure it doesn't work for vector tiles, but vector tiles are an evolving thing so targeting that could be tricky from a standards POV |
Some (UK MOD, for example) find ISO 19117 Portrayal a good way to manage a set of styling 'rules'. Any group should also look at MapML, which has been presented to the OGC/W3C Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group. Terse notes of meetings at https://www.w3.org/2017/sdwig/, MapML usually discussed in their 'plenary meetings'; MapML itself at https://github.com/Maps4HTML/MapML. I haven't personally looked at it much, but more active members of SDWIG have. |
merge with #47 |
Sorry to insist and something like this to start ? It gives a practical solution and maybe we can build from there ... |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: