Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Featue Request: HTTP Method and host name in 'convs' #6

Open
eldraco opened this issue Feb 5, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Featue Request: HTTP Method and host name in 'convs' #6

eldraco opened this issue Feb 5, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@eldraco
Copy link

eldraco commented Feb 5, 2015

Hi.
I was wondering if there is some plan to show the HTTP method (GET or POST or whatever) that was originally sent and the host name in the output of the convs command.

Now if I made convs, I got something like:
CT> convs
Conversations Found:
0: /cloud.html -> text/html (cloud.html) [1B]
1: /navigate.xml -> text/xml (navigate.xml) [251 B]
2: / -> (2.html) [0 B]
3: /navigate_oswhite.xml -> text/xml (navigate_oswhite.xml) [159 B]
4: /navigate_bwfix.xml -> text/xml (navigate_bwfix.xml) [157 B]

But I lost to which host they were made and with which method.

thanks
sebas

@omriher
Copy link
Owner

omriher commented Feb 5, 2015

Hi,
I'm working on a version update that includes many improvements,
One of which is displaying the method type when using the 'info' command.

How do you think the convs list should be displayed?

@eldraco
Copy link
Author

eldraco commented Feb 5, 2015

Hi thanks for working on this!

Well... since maybe not everyone want to see the method right away what about something like this?

0: test.com/cloud.html -> text/html (cloud.html) (POST) [1B]
1: test.com/navigate.xml -> text/xml (navigate.xml) (GET) [251 B]
2: other.long.domain.co.uk/ -> (2.html) (GET) [0 B]
3: another.mil/navigate_oswhite.xml -> text/xml (navigate_oswhite.xml) (GET) [159 B]
4: more.dom.me/navigate_bwfix.xml -> text/xml (navigate_bwfix.xml) (POST) [157 B]

If the indentation is important, maybe some column-wise tabs can be placed..., but probably is not a good idea.
A better idea is maybe to use those nice colors to separate the domain from the rest of the URI

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you are only analyzing port 80 right? So now there is no need for http or https..., but maybe in the future that can be put in there also.

thanks again
sebas

@ekse
Copy link

ekse commented Apr 8, 2015

Please add something like this. Perhaps a command 'urls' could be added to show the list of urls that were requested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants