From 5ebe4fa1b87edd8f7eb41064657729f967224a29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ross Brunton <ross@codeplay.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:31:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update urProgramGetFunctionPointer test

The spec says that implementations may return
`UR_RESULT_ERROR_FUNCTION_ADDRESS_NOT_AVAILABLE` for this function, but
that wasn't handled by this test.
---
 test/conformance/program/urProgramGetFunctionPointer.cpp | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/conformance/program/urProgramGetFunctionPointer.cpp b/test/conformance/program/urProgramGetFunctionPointer.cpp
index 41d397d527..08732ddfcc 100644
--- a/test/conformance/program/urProgramGetFunctionPointer.cpp
+++ b/test/conformance/program/urProgramGetFunctionPointer.cpp
@@ -21,8 +21,12 @@ UUR_INSTANTIATE_KERNEL_TEST_SUITE_P(urProgramGetFunctionPointerTest);
 
 TEST_P(urProgramGetFunctionPointerTest, Success) {
     void *function_pointer = nullptr;
-    ASSERT_SUCCESS(urProgramGetFunctionPointer(
-        device, program, function_name.data(), &function_pointer));
+    ur_result_t res = urProgramGetFunctionPointer(
+        device, program, function_name.data(), &function_pointer);
+    if (res == UR_RESULT_ERROR_FUNCTION_ADDRESS_NOT_AVAILABLE) {
+        return;
+    }
+    ASSERT_SUCCESS(res);
     ASSERT_NE(function_pointer, nullptr);
 }