You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is less of a bug and more of a documentation request.
Because there are two sites with different 'latest' guidance, it's very confusing for me to work out which guidelines I should be looking at and navigating between current and previous versions of the documentation.
In addition, because the two sites are so visually similar and linked together on guidelines.openaire.eu, it's difficult to realise that you've actually LEFT the openaire.eu site, and gone to another site.
Could the 'latest' version on the guidelines.openaire.eu site perhaps be labelled as 'draft' to indicate that they are not the current active guidelines? Alternatively, if the readthedocs site is not the latest active version, could this be reflected there instead?
Finally, and this is perhaps a request for the OpenAire team directly, do you know which version of the guidelines is in active use by the OpenAire harvester? We're not seeing resource types for our ingested records, and I've double checked that we're sending the correct metadata.
Tom Wrobel
Development Team Lead, ORA - Oxford University Research Archive (https://ora.ox.ac.uk)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear all
This is less of a bug and more of a documentation request.
Because there are two sites with different 'latest' guidance, it's very confusing for me to work out which guidelines I should be looking at and navigating between current and previous versions of the documentation.
Both are 'lastest', but there are differences between the two. For example:
In addition, because the two sites are so visually similar and linked together on guidelines.openaire.eu, it's difficult to realise that you've actually LEFT the openaire.eu site, and gone to another site.
Could the 'latest' version on the guidelines.openaire.eu site perhaps be labelled as 'draft' to indicate that they are not the current active guidelines? Alternatively, if the readthedocs site is not the latest active version, could this be reflected there instead?
Finally, and this is perhaps a request for the OpenAire team directly, do you know which version of the guidelines is in active use by the OpenAire harvester? We're not seeing resource types for our ingested records, and I've double checked that we're sending the correct metadata.
Tom Wrobel
Development Team Lead, ORA - Oxford University Research Archive (https://ora.ox.ac.uk)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: