chore: checkout repos from openedx insted of edx in analyze depedents workflow

[brian-smith-tcril]

Description

Updates most of the repos in the analyze dependents workflow to checkout from openedx/ instead of edx/

Verified via a workflow run on my fork https://github.com/brian-smith-tcril/paragon/actions/runs/9486407270/job/26140657441

Merge Checklist

• If your update includes visual changes, have they been reviewed by a designer? Send them a link to the Netlify deploy preview, if applicable.
• Does your change adhere to the documented style conventions?
• Do any prop types have missing descriptions in the Props API tables in the documentation site (check deploy preview)?
• Were your changes tested using all available themes (see theme switcher in the header of the deploy preview, under the "Settings" icon)?
• Were your changes tested in the example app?
• Is there adequate test coverage for your changes?
• Consider whether this change needs to reviewed/QA'ed for accessibility (a11y). If so, please request an a11y review for the PR in the #wg-paragon Open edX Slack channel.

Post-merge Checklist

• Verify your changes were released to NPM at the expected version.
• If you'd like, share your contribution in #show-and-tell.
• 🎉 🙌 Celebrate! Thanks for your contribution.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for paragon-openedx ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	592f417
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/paragon-openedx/deploys/6669d08655abc10008654e5f
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-3089--paragon-openedx.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[adamstankiewicz]

Hopefully having prospectus in here won't cause it to break. It's also still questionable whether prospectus really should be in here at all given it's technically a private repo for 2U, and may cause an error to occur if the workflow doesn't have the correct permissions to clone it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.20%. Comparing base (13bca51) to head (592f417).
Report is 181 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3089   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.20%   93.20%           
=======================================
  Files         249      249           
  Lines        4359     4359           
  Branches     1034     1034           
=======================================
  Hits         4063     4063           
+ Misses        293      290    -3     
- Partials        3        6    +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[brian-smith-tcril]

Hopefully having prospectus in here won't cause it to break. It's also still questionable whether prospectus really should be in here at all given it's technically a private repo for 2U, and may cause an error to occur if the workflow doesn't have the correct permissions to clone it.

Yeah, I commented it out for the workflow run on my fork since I don't have the SEMANTIC_RELEASE_GITHUB_TOKEN there, I figure we can merge this as is and try running it - if prospectus ends up still being problematic I'll make a new PR removing it.

[openedx-semantic-release-bot]

🎉 This PR is included in version 22.6.1 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

[openedx-semantic-release-bot]

🎉 This PR is included in version 23.0.0-alpha.7 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@alpha dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀