Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is everybody going to be working on, at the 2024 Joint OGC - ASF - OSGeo Sprint? #127

Open
doublebyte1 opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 12 comments

Comments

@doublebyte1
Copy link
Collaborator

doublebyte1 commented Dec 20, 2023

Post a comment letting us know what you are going to be working on.

@doublebyte1 doublebyte1 changed the title What is everybody going to be working on at the 2024 Joint OGC - ASF - OSGeo Sprint? What is everybody going to be working on, at the 2024 Joint OGC - ASF - OSGeo Sprint? Dec 20, 2023
@fgravin
Copy link
Contributor

fgravin commented Jan 31, 2024

I am planning to work mostly on

  • OGC API Records Facet proposal, to make it concrete and accepted
  • GeoNetwork OsGeo project to investigate using OGC API Records back from the geonetwork-ui datahub project

@gberaudo
Copy link

gberaudo commented Feb 1, 2024

Provided my registration is accepted, I am planning to work on:

  • OL-Cesium examples improvements;
  • OpenLayers flat style improvements.

@doublebyte1, would be great to improve the registration process.
See my comments to the organizers in my registration application.

@doublebyte1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@gberaudo thank you for the feedback and welcome to the code sprint!

@jerstlouis
Copy link
Member

jerstlouis commented Feb 8, 2024

Some of the things we may end up working on at the code sprint:

@desruisseaux
Copy link
Contributor

GeoAPI 3.0 currently has two implementations:

If there is volunteers, a topic that I propose is to add wrappers for the following implementations (I do not plan to do this work myself for now, but would be very glad to help if someone takes this task):

  • PROJ4J
  • GeoTools 30 or later

An immediate benefit for those projects is to be able to run test suites, including the Geospatial Integrity of Geoscience Software tests.

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Contributor

tomkralidis commented Feb 20, 2024

From here:

@kalxas
Copy link
Member

kalxas commented Feb 27, 2024

My work plan:

@TaehoonK
Copy link

MF-SWG:
Documentation

Development

  • Further implementation of APIs not supported by MF-API Server (queryable API part)
  • Implement STINUUM to support the newly implemented function of the MF-API Server

For more details: https://github.com/opengeospatial/mf-swg/tree/main/codesprint/2024_joint_ogc_osgeo_asf_code_sprint

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Contributor

My resulting report can be found at #131

@maxcollombin
Copy link
Contributor

Styles & Symbology report: #132

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Contributor

Update: the pygeoapi "Shapely functions as a process work" that originated at this sprint has resulted in the integration into pygeoapi core master branch: geopython/pygeoapi#1565 (docs now at https://docs.pygeoapi.io/en/latest/data-publishing/ogcapi-processes.html#shapely-functions-optional). Thanks for the valuable contribution @jeafreezy!

@jeafreezy
Copy link

Thank you @tomkralidis! I took a look at the deployed docs, and I noticed a typo in the curl url. It must have been an oversight from my end. I was going to open a PR to fix that, but I noticed you have already. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants