Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review Part 3 content about collection inputs ... #475

Open
pvretano opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Review Part 3 content about collection inputs ... #475

pvretano opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@pvretano
Copy link
Contributor

Review Part 3 content about collection inputs to see if some of that discussion should actually be moved to Part 1.

@jerstlouis
Copy link
Member

My suggestion is that the "Collection Input" and "Remote Collections" (both using the "collection" key in the execution request, representing a local vs. remote collection respectively) are the ones that should be moved to Part 1 as an alternate mechanism to provide an input in addition to "href" and "value" (and the direct short-hand form of passing a value which does not use an object).

This corresponds to Section 8 in the current Part 3 - Workflows.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants