-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Anticipated Part 1 timeline #162
Comments
21-APR-2023: If we can complete the harmonization issues with STAC, and complete the ATS and clean up a few other minor editorial issues, we should be in a position to hand off the specification for OAB review by end of Sept. Of course, we have other dependencies (e.g. Feature taking over the API components -- sorting, q, etc.) but from our end, end of Sept. seems achievable. |
We should submit to OAB once this one is completed: #309 |
@kalxas, once we finish #309 we can create a "1.0 DRAFT" tag but we still need to review the document and make sure everything is ship shape before we apporach the OAB. Based on the project board I think we should be able to present to the OAB in Jan. B.T.W. does anyone know the process for tagging a 1.0 Draft? |
We should also make sure that the ATS is updated every time we make changes to requirements. |
Since we are presenting to the OAB today, 14-MAY-2024, I'm closing this. We were only off by a year! LOL! |
The following is the anticipated timeline for Part 1 of OGC API - Records. The most important thing is to leave time for implementations, testing, code sprints, etc. to shake down the specification.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: