Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Anticipated Part 1 timeline #162

Closed
pvretano opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Anticipated Part 1 timeline #162

pvretano opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@pvretano
Copy link
Contributor

pvretano commented Mar 2, 2022

The following is the anticipated timeline for Part 1 of OGC API - Records. The most important thing is to leave time for implementations, testing, code sprints, etc. to shake down the specification.

  • Mid/Late Q1 2022
    • initial, tagged, 1.0-draft
  • Mid/Late Q1 to Mid Q3
    • Solicit feedback on 1.0-draft
    • Ongoing review of document and addressing of issues and comments
    • Implementations, implementations, implementation
    • Several implementations of searchable catalogues already exist
    • Code sprint(s)
    • Don’t want to rush this phase
  • Mid Q3
    • Submission of OAB and 30-day RFC
    • Address RFC comments
  • Late Q3 & Early Q4
    • Submission to TC for adoption vote
    • Thereafter we can consider an ISO submission.
@pvretano
Copy link
Contributor Author

21-APR-2023: If we can complete the harmonization issues with STAC, and complete the ATS and clean up a few other minor editorial issues, we should be in a position to hand off the specification for OAB review by end of Sept. Of course, we have other dependencies (e.g. Feature taking over the API components -- sorting, q, etc.) but from our end, end of Sept. seems achievable.

@kalxas
Copy link
Member

kalxas commented Dec 29, 2023

We should submit to OAB once this one is completed: #309

@pvretano
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kalxas, once we finish #309 we can create a "1.0 DRAFT" tag but we still need to review the document and make sure everything is ship shape before we apporach the OAB. Based on the project board I think we should be able to present to the OAB in Jan.

B.T.W. does anyone know the process for tagging a 1.0 Draft?

@kalxas
Copy link
Member

kalxas commented Jan 2, 2024

We should also make sure that the ATS is updated every time we make changes to requirements.

@pvretano
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since we are presenting to the OAB today, 14-MAY-2024, I'm closing this. We were only off by a year! LOL!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants