scholarLY name

[jefferyshivers]

How should scholarLY be spelled, case-wise, both in documentation and file names (if differently)?

Currently "openLilyLib" leads with lowercase, then camel case after that. "ScholarLY", as it is referenced in this repository, leads with uppercase. I suggest following the case of openLilyLib by referring to scholarLY officially as "scholarLY". This is what the latex package documentation (in progress) currently reflects, but I need to know if it should really be "ScholarLY".

This is a little more particular, but just to get feedback on the filenames as well, would it be preferred to use all lowercase? As in scholarly.dtx scholarly.ins etc. Currently, I'm using scholarLY.[..]. It's slightly tedious to capitalize, but I do prefer it since it would match the official name if we go with "scholarLY." If the official name is decided as "ScholarLY" though, I would then prefer to go all lowercase with the file names.

[jefferyshivers]

Well, the more I see it now, the more I am pro-"ScholarLY" for the formal name (and "scholarly.[..]" for file names).

[uliska]

Well, I've always thought of it as scholarLY, but I don't mind ScholarLY either.

Having all file names lowercase only seems good to me.