-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an application vignette #448
Comments
@yonicd I finally added this issue, feel free to add other ideas in the description |
Not sure, could be worth a try! I think we had a similar idea (cLDA) in the issues/discussions before |
Ref2 has a nice example w gls, it is straight fw. It looks like you need to setup the design matrix a bit manually, but overall easy enough. |
i tested out the cLDA formula yesterday. It is pretty simple.
This notation is analogous to a design matrix that does not include the ARMCD as a variable but does include VISITN and the interaction of VISITN*ARMCD. This design matrix aligns with the model assumption:
One of the motivations of this design is when there is missingness in the baseline, in such cases in the standard mmrm formula those rows would be dropped since FEV_BL is missing. @danielinteractive I think then maybe it would be worth to have a version of data with missingness in baseline to show how mmrm and clda could yield different inferential results, what do you think? |
Thanks @yonicd for digging into this, much appreciated! Yeah, I think that modified version could be created inside the vignette to demonstrate this. |
@yonicd would you like to take this on in terms of adding a vignette? |
To do:
mmrm
emmeans
(going beyond what we have already in the introduction vignette)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: