Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bad fit observed for specific data #467

Open
clarkliming opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

bad fit observed for specific data #467

clarkliming opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@clarkliming
Copy link
Collaborator

recently I ran into a very bad fit on only one of my machines with BFGS optimizer. The data is uploaded, and the call is

mmrm::mmrm(
  chgus ~ bcva_bl + strata + trt * visit + csh(visit | id),
  data = data,
  optimizer = "BFGS"
)

the result looks like
image

but using L-BFGS-B everything looks much better
image

The session info can be found here

R version 4.3.0 (2023-04-21)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 (Ootpa)

Matrix products: default
BLAS/LAPACK: /apps/rocs/2020.08/cascadelake/software/OpenBLAS/0.3.9-GCC-9.3.0/lib/libopenblas_skylakexp-r0.3.9.so;  LAPACK version 3.9.0

locale:
 [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8       LC_NUMERIC=C              
 [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8        LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8    
 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8    LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8   
 [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8       LC_NAME=C                 
 [9] LC_ADDRESS=C               LC_TELEPHONE=C            
[11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C       

time zone: Europe/Amsterdam
tzcode source: system (glibc)

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base     

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] vctrs_0.6.5      nlme_3.1-165     cli_3.6.1        rlang_1.1.1     
 [5] stringi_1.7.12   purrr_1.0.2      generics_0.1.3   assertthat_0.2.1
 [9] glue_1.6.2       bit_4.0.5        backports_1.4.1  TMB_1.9.13      
[13] fansi_1.0.4      grid_4.3.0       tibble_3.2.1     lifecycle_1.0.3 
[17] stringr_1.5.1    compiler_4.3.0   pkgconfig_2.0.3  Rcpp_1.0.10     
[21] lattice_0.21-8   mmrm_0.3.12      R6_2.5.1         utf8_1.2.3      
[25] tidyselect_1.2.0 pillar_1.9.0     Rdpack_2.4       parallel_4.3.0  
[29] rbibutils_2.2.13 magrittr_2.0.3   checkmate_2.2.0  Matrix_1.5-4    
[33] tools_4.3.0      bit64_4.0.5      arrow_16.1.0    

data.rds.gz

@danielinteractive
Copy link
Collaborator

Hm interesting, thanks @clarkliming . Is this looking any better with the latest TMB? And how is it with the default optimizer "L-BFGS-B"?

@clarkliming
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@danielinteractive yes the L-BFGS-B works well on this case, see the screenshot above. The reason to use BFGS is just following your script

optimizer = c("BFGS", "L-BFGS-B") # NOTE: Errors when using L-BFGS-B first
(it says that it errors if using L-BFGS-B first)

@danielinteractive
Copy link
Collaborator

I see thanks @clarkliming , and does the new TMB change anything for this case or not?

@clarkliming
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I see thanks @clarkliming , and does the new TMB change anything for this case or not?

haven't had the chance to test the new TMB; currently ocean only supports R-4.3 however in rspm Matrix require at least R-4.4; installing previous version from source always fails while installing from binary also fails (tell me that not supported)

@danielinteractive
Copy link
Collaborator

Ah ok, maybe something to check with the Ocean team for help?

@danielinteractive
Copy link
Collaborator

@clarkliming At least here on a Windows laptop I get a good result with BFGS:

mmrm fit

Formula:     
chgus ~ bcva_bl + strata + trt * visit + csh(visit | id)
Data:        data (used 4187 observations from 600 
subjects with maximum 10 timepoints)
Covariance:  heterogeneous compound symmetry (11 variance parameters)
Inference:   REML
Deviance:    15772.96

Coefficients: 
 (Intercept)      bcva_bl      strata2      strata3 
 5.410293519 -0.001688518 -0.989200445  0.972129787 
         trt       visit2       visit3       visit4 
 0.529867484  0.385529338  0.492312456  0.767195714 
      visit5       visit6       visit7       visit8 
 1.000949167  1.255761630  1.644350117  1.756062232 
      visit9      visit10   trt:visit2   trt:visit3 
 1.985387524  2.286288313  0.270066643  0.924385656 
  trt:visit4   trt:visit5   trt:visit6   trt:visit7 
 1.382654349  1.868366516  2.300515152  2.815120004 
  trt:visit8   trt:visit9  trt:visit10 
 3.592565124  4.138062176  4.602394616 

Model Inference Optimization:
Converged with code 0 and message: No message provided.

With the latest mmrm package

R version 4.4.1 (2024-06-14 ucrt)
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64
Running under: Windows 11 x64 (build 22631)

Matrix products: default


locale:
[1] LC_COLLATE=German_Switzerland.utf8 
[2] LC_CTYPE=German_Switzerland.utf8   
[3] LC_MONETARY=German_Switzerland.utf8
[4] LC_NUMERIC=C                       
[5] LC_TIME=German_Switzerland.utf8    

time zone: Asia/Taipei
tzcode source: internal

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods  
[7] base     

other attached packages:
[1] mmrm_0.3.14

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] assertthat_0.2.1  backports_1.5.0   R6_2.5.1         
 [4] tidyselect_1.2.1  bit_4.5.0         Matrix_1.7-0     
 [7] lattice_0.22-6    tzdb_0.4.0        magrittr_2.0.3   
[10] glue_1.7.0        bit64_4.5.2       generics_0.1.3   
[13] lifecycle_1.0.4   cli_3.6.3         Rdpack_2.6.1     
[16] TMB_1.9.15        arrow_17.0.0.1    vctrs_0.6.5      
[19] grid_4.4.1        compiler_4.4.1    rstudioapi_0.16.0
[22] purrr_1.0.2       rbibutils_2.2.16  tools_4.4.1      
[25] checkmate_2.3.2   nlme_3.1-164      Rcpp_1.0.13      
[28] rlang_1.1.4 

@clarkliming
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@danielinteractive yes this bad fit only occurs on one of my machine, has not got the time to investigate

@danielinteractive
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @clarkliming , did you get a chance to try already with the latest version of the package?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants