Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stubby: Use standard notation for IPv6 local loopback address ( ::1 instead of 0::1 ) #17252

Open
shoulders opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@shoulders
Copy link

shoulders commented Dec 2, 2021

Maintainer: @jamesmacwhite
Environment:

Item Value
Model BT Home Hub 5A
Architecture xRX200 rev 1.2
Firmware Version OpenWrt 21.02.1 r16325-88151b8303 / LuCI openwrt-21.02 branch git-21.295.67054-13df80d
Kernel Version 5.4.154

Description:

Within the documentation and config files of stubby and the OpenWrt instructions you use the address 0::1 for the IPv6 local loopback address (which does work) but I cannot find anywhere else that uses this form, everyone uses ::1

I think these instances should be changed to keep things easier to read unless there is a technical reason for this.

These are a few that I found

README.md (several occurances)
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/blob/master/net/stubby/files/README.md

list listen_address '0::1@5453'

I have posted this over at getdnsapi/stubby aswell ****

@jamesmacwhite
Copy link
Contributor

Hi. Not the maintainer I'm afraid, but submit a PR and someone with push access can help get it merged.

@msvamp
Copy link

msvamp commented Jul 5, 2022

This seems like a limitation in the upstream stubby:

However, no reason for this limitation is specified.

In my recent PR (#18863), I have added a note in the README about this: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/18863/files#diff-19dbc41aac11b9f660a125da07966a249ce1a0407f1072ea23ac7c28efc35113R232-R234

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants