Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove hash_elements_max accounting from DBUF and ARC #16759

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

amotin
Copy link
Member

@amotin amotin commented Nov 14, 2024

Those values require global atomics to get current hash_elements values in few of the hottest code paths, while in all the years I never cared about it. If somebody wants, it should be easy to get it by periodic sampling, since neither ARC header nor DBUF counts change so fast that it would be difficult to catch.

For now I've left hash_elements_max kstat for ARC, since it was used/reported by arc_summary and it would break older versions, but now it just reports the current value.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

Those values require global atomics to get current hash_elements
values in few of the hottest code paths, while in all the years I
never cared about it.  If somebody wants, it should be easy to
get it by periodic sampling, since neither ARC header nor DBUF
counts change so fast that it would be difficult to catch.

For now I've left hash_elements_max kstat for ARC, since it was
used/reported by arc_summary and it would break older versions,
but now it just reports the current value.

Signed-off-by:	Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
@amotin amotin added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Nov 14, 2024
@behlendorf behlendorf self-requested a review November 15, 2024 01:19
@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Nov 19, 2024
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 5346889 into openzfs:master Nov 19, 2024
24 checks passed
@amotin amotin deleted the elements_max branch November 19, 2024 15:02
behlendorf pushed a commit to behlendorf/zfs that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Those values require global atomics to get current hash_elements
values in few of the hottest code paths, while in all the years I
never cared about it.  If somebody wants, it should be easy to
get it by periodic sampling, since neither ARC header nor DBUF
counts change so fast that it would be difficult to catch.

For now I've left hash_elements_max kstat for ARC, since it was
used/reported by arc_summary and it would break older versions,
but now it just reports the current value.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#16759
behlendorf pushed a commit to behlendorf/zfs that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Those values require global atomics to get current hash_elements
values in few of the hottest code paths, while in all the years I
never cared about it.  If somebody wants, it should be easy to
get it by periodic sampling, since neither ARC header nor DBUF
counts change so fast that it would be difficult to catch.

For now I've left hash_elements_max kstat for ARC, since it was
used/reported by arc_summary and it would break older versions,
but now it just reports the current value.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#16759
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants