You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The existing placement of C12 (100 µF) potentially interferes slightly with the printed part:
This could create pressure on the capacitor solder joint, especially given some variance in the actual part diameter and positioning during reflow.
Additionally, part availability for electrolytic caps in the 6.3mm footprint at the required voltage and capacitance is very limited. Upgrading to an 8mm footprint allows a much broader part selection from higher-quality manufacturers.
Suggested Solution
update C16 to an 8mm footprint
nudge footprint position for C12
add some clearances to the printed parts for the repositioned solder joints
In my attempt this produces the following PCB layout (printed part outline in orange for reference):
and leaves plenty of room for the larger capacitor in the assembly:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Version Number
rev12-mobo
Bugfix or Enhancement
bugfix and enhancement
Description
The existing placement of C12 (100 µF) potentially interferes slightly with the printed part:
This could create pressure on the capacitor solder joint, especially given some variance in the actual part diameter and positioning during reflow.
Additionally, part availability for electrolytic caps in the 6.3mm footprint at the required voltage and capacitance is very limited. Upgrading to an 8mm footprint allows a much broader part selection from higher-quality manufacturers.
Suggested Solution
In my attempt this produces the following PCB layout (printed part outline in orange for reference):
and leaves plenty of room for the larger capacitor in the assembly:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: