Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pololu Standard Stepper Drivers are Costly and Time Consuming #697

Open
sphawes opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Pololu Standard Stepper Drivers are Costly and Time Consuming #697

sphawes opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
area: pcb requires an update to an electrical design project: lumen has to do with the lumen pnp base machine

Comments

@sphawes
Copy link
Member

sphawes commented Jan 4, 2024

Version Number

REV04

Bugfix or Enhancement

Enhancement

Description

The TMC2209 stepper drivers in the Pololu stepper driver format have worked well, but they are very costly, depend on a company to source (are pseudo-open), and require two 1x6 THT headers and one 1x2 THT header for each driver for a solid connection.

They also appear to be using the TMC2209's internal shunt resistor, which is less than optimal for measuring current accurately.

Suggested Solution

Implement stepper drivers on the motherboard itself. Although this means drivers are no longer swappable, we have seen almost no instances of bad drivers, and the ones we did were a result of them being DOA from the manufacturer.

We'll also use a much easier to inspect/solder variant of the TMC2209, the TMC2226. This chip is identical, except for the package which is much larger and has legs.

We can also use large, accurate shunt resistors for a better measurement of coil current.

@sphawes sphawes added area: pcb requires an update to an electrical design project: lumen has to do with the lumen pnp base machine labels Jan 4, 2024
@sphawes sphawes added this to the REV05 Motherboard milestone Jan 4, 2024
@sphawes sphawes self-assigned this Jan 4, 2024
@warasilapm
Copy link

Maybe I'm a weirdo, but IMO the TMC2209 QFN is the better part between the two. It's more compact and just as easy to solder/inspect. If anything, I actually find inspection easier since the QFN is side wettable and there's no foot fillet to worry about. I also find QFN self-centers far better, at least in my experience.

Just my two cents - I was going to suggest the 2209 when I saw the layout and then when I went looking for duplicates I saw this reasoning here. Totally up to you; you know your process better than I do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: pcb requires an update to an electrical design project: lumen has to do with the lumen pnp base machine
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants