You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need a term represent the chunks of material have actually been put in teeth
in order to restore them. The reason for this is that during a single
restoration procedure a portion of restoration material will often span
multiple surfaces. Thus, when a restoration fails, it is not enough to say that
the surface failed. Rather, the whole portion of material, which may span
multiple surfaces, failed.
In the code (see eaglesoft-fillings.lisp), I have represented the relation
between the material and the surface restored using the 'is dental restoration
of' relation like so:
procedure_instance <- instance of tooth restoration procedure
material_instance <- instance of dental restoration material
surface_instance <- instance of surface enamel of tooth
for each surface_instance that is restored during procedure_instance
material_instance 'is dental restoration of' surface_instance
A proposed definition for the term could be:
surface filling =def. a portion of dental restoration material that restores
(i.e., 'is dental restoration of') one or more tooth surfaces
Question:
Do we need similar terms for crowns, inlays, and onlays?
Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 5 May 2015 at 8:50
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
[email protected]
on 5 May 2015 at 8:50The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: