Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

surface filling/restoration #51

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Sep 11, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

surface filling/restoration #51

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Sep 11, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

We need a term represent the chunks of material have actually been put in teeth 
in order to restore them. The reason for this is that during a single 
restoration procedure a portion of restoration material will often span 
multiple surfaces. Thus, when a restoration fails, it is not enough to say that 
the surface failed. Rather, the whole portion of material, which may span 
multiple surfaces, failed.

In the code (see eaglesoft-fillings.lisp), I have represented the relation 
between the material and the surface restored using the 'is dental restoration 
of' relation like so:

procedure_instance <- instance of tooth restoration procedure
material_instance <- instance of dental restoration material
surface_instance <- instance of surface enamel of tooth

for each surface_instance that is restored during procedure_instance
  material_instance 'is dental restoration of' surface_instance

A proposed definition for the term could be:

surface filling =def. a portion of dental restoration material that restores 
(i.e., 'is dental restoration of') one or more tooth surfaces

Question:
Do we need similar terms for crowns, inlays, and onlays?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 5 May 2015 at 8:50

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant